MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (3100 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (4 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (December 2022 vs January 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
December 2022
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
MT6896Z
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
2 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Xclipse 960
950 MHz
GPU frequency
-
1.442 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
6
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
-
5.3
Bluetooth
-
6
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
-
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
MediaTek APU 580
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8200
1229
Exynos 2600
3150
+156%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8200
3892
Exynos 2600
11100
+185%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8200-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>