AMD Radeon R9 M395X

AMD Radeon R9 M395X: Review of an Outdated Giant for Enthusiasts in 2025
April 2025
Introduction
In an era where ray tracing and neural network technologies have become the norm, the AMD Radeon R9 M395X serves as a reminder of a time when gaming performance was measured in teraflops rather than RTX frames. Released in 2015, this graphics card was once the top option for mobile workstations and gaming laptops. In 2025, it still retains a niche audience. Let's explore who might find it useful today.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Architecture: The R9 M395X is built on the 3rd generation Graphics Core Next (GCN) microarchitecture, which at the time provided breakthroughs in energy efficiency and parallel computing.
Manufacturing Process: It is produced using a 28nm process by TSMC. By modern standards, this is a "dinosaur" — new GPUs utilize 5nm and 4nm nodes.
Unique features:
- Mantle API — the predecessor to Vulkan, optimizing hardware interaction.
- FreeSync — adaptive synchronization that remains relevant today.
- Eyefinity — support for multi-monitor configurations (up to 6 displays).
Missing: Hardware ray tracing (RT Cores), and no equivalents to DLSS/FSR 1.0+. The card is incompatible with FSR 3.0 and newer due to driver limitations.
2. Memory
Type and Size: 4GB GDDR5 — modest for modern games, but sufficient for older projects and basic professional tasks.
Bus and Bandwidth: A 256-bit bus provides 153.6 GB/s. For comparison, modern cards with GDDR6X achieve over 900 GB/s.
Impact on Performance: In games from 2015 to 2020 (e.g., The Witcher 3, GTA V), the memory size is enough for medium settings at 1080p. In newer projects (2023–2025), drops may occur due to a lack of VRAM even at low presets.
3. Gaming Performance
Average FPS (1080p, medium settings):
- Cyberpunk 2077 (no RTX): 25–30 FPS.
- Red Dead Redemption 2: 35–40 FPS.
- Fortnite (Performance mode): 60–70 FPS.
- CS2: 90–110 FPS.
1440p and 4K: Not recommended — FPS drops below 30 even in less demanding games.
Ray Tracing: Not supported natively. Software emulation (e.g., through Proton for Linux) reduces performance by 3–4 times.
4. Professional Tasks
Video Editing: In Adobe Premiere Pro (OpenCL), rendering 1080p video takes 2–3 times longer than on modern GPUs.
3D Modeling: In Blender (Cycles), rendering a moderately complex scene takes 15–20 minutes, compared to 2–3 minutes on an RTX 4060.
Scientific Calculations: OpenCL support allows the card to be used for machine learning, but the absence of Tensor Cores and low computing precision make it impractical.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP: 125W — a high value, even for 2025.
Cooling:
- A system with 2–3 fans or liquid cooling in the case is mandatory.
- Recommended cases: those with good ventilation (e.g., Fractal Design Meshify 2).
Tips:
- A power supply of at least 500W (with headroom for upgrades).
- Regular thermal paste replacement — overheating to 85°C is possible under load.
6. Comparison with Competitors
Analogues from 2015–2017:
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M: Comparable in performance but better in energy efficiency (TDP 100W).
- AMD Radeon RX 480 (desktop): More powerful (5.8 TFLOPS vs. 4.0 TFLOPS for R9 M395X).
Modern Budget GPUs (2025):
- NVIDIA RTX 3050 (6GB): 2.5 times faster, supports DLSS 3.5 and RTX.
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT: Comparable in price on the second-hand market but more efficient in games from 2020 and beyond.
7. Practical Advice
Power Supply: Minimum of 500W with an 80+ Bronze certification.
Compatibility:
- PCIe 3.0 x16 — works in PCIe 4.0/5.0 slots but without speed gains.
- OS support: Official drivers were discontinued in 2022. It’s better to use Windows 10 or Linux with open-source drivers (AMDGPU).
Drivers:
- Avoid new games with DirectX 12 Ultimate requirements.
- For older projects, Adrenalin drivers 22.11.2 work well.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price on the second-hand market ($50–80).
- Support for FreeSync and multi-monitor setups.
- Reliability — lasts for years with proper cooling.
Cons:
- No support for ray tracing and FSR 3.0+.
- High power consumption.
- Limited performance in modern games.
9. Final Verdict: Who is the R9 M395X For?
1. Owners of Old PCs: For upgrading systems with processors like Intel Core i5-4xxx or AMD FX-8xxx.
2. Retro Gaming Enthusiasts: Ideal for projects from the 2010s at max settings.
3. Budget Builds: Suitable for those looking to build a PC for $200–300 for office tasks and streaming.
Why choose it? It's a nod to nostalgia and a practical choice for those not chasing cutting-edge technology but valuing proven hardware. However, for modern tasks, it's better to consider budget new releases from 2025 — like the AMD Radeon RX 7500 or Intel Arc A580.
Conclusion
The Radeon R9 M395X is a relic that reminds us: technology rushes forward, but older hardware can still be useful. It should only be purchased if you are aware of its limitations and are willing to make compromises. In a world where even budget GPUs can outpace it by leaps and bounds, it remains a symbol of an era when every game was optimized with care.