Unisoc T606

Unisoc T606
Unisoc T606 mobile chipset review

Unisoc T606: Overview of a Budget Processor for Low-Cost Smartphones

Unisoc T606 is the baseline for a cheap 4G smartphone. It is faster than older platforms with Cortex-A53, but in a real device, performance quickly gets limited by weak graphics, RAM capacity, storage, and heavy user interfaces.

The purpose of the T606 isn't high speed, but the ability to run basic applications without constant delays: messaging apps, browsers, YouTube, maps, banking applications, and simple games.

In brief: The T606 is only suitable for very inexpensive phones, ideally with 4-6 GB of RAM and not the slowest storage.

Why the T606 is Still in Use

The T606 remains on the market not due to speed. Manufacturers need an inexpensive 4G chip that can still handle modern Android at a basic level.

It features two Cortex-A75 cores, Mali-G57 MP1 graphics, LPDDR4X support, and the ability to use UFS storage. For the ultra-budget segment, this is sufficient to prevent the smartphone from falling to the level of older platforms with Cortex-A53.

As a result, the T606 can be found in budget models from Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Tecno, Infinix, and other brands. This chip is designed for devices where price, battery life, and simple use cases are prioritized.

CPU: Better than Old Ultra-Budget, but No Headroom

The CPU includes 2 Cortex-A75 cores and 6 Cortex-A55 cores with clock speeds up to 1.6 GHz.

The two Cortex-A75 cores are the main advantage of the T606 when compared to the old ultra-budget. Compared to chips with Cortex-A53, this provides quicker application launches and fewer interface delays.

The limitations are clear: a clock speed of up to 1.6 GHz and an old 12nm manufacturing process. In heavy content feeds, browsers with many tabs, and frequent app switching, delays and background task reloads appear.

The T606 isn't designed for prolonged heavy loads and doesn't make the smartphone feel fast. It keeps the device above the level of older ultra-budget platforms but doesn't provide room for several years of use.

Graphics: The Main Limiting Factor

Mali-G57 appears more modern than older budget GPUs, but the T606 uses an MP1 configuration. This is the minimal variant with a single graphics core. Therefore, the main limitation of the T606 is the graphics, not the CPU.

For interfacing, video, simple arcade games, and less demanding games, this is sufficient. However, heavy 3D games quickly hit the wall of low GPU performance.

PUBG Mobile, World of Tanks Blitz, and similar games are only playable on low settings. In Genshin Impact and other demanding 3D projects, you will face not only FPS drops but also long load times, freezes, and heating.

For gaming, it's better to look at Helio G85/G88, Snapdragon 680, or newer 6nm platforms.

Memory and Storage Are More Important than the Chip Name

Smartphones with the T606 can differ significantly in speed. The variation is usually in RAM capacity, storage type, and UI.

The acceptable minimum is:

  • 4 GB RAM - the lower boundary;
  • 6 GB RAM - noticeably better;
  • UFS storage - a significant advantage;
  • 2-3 GB RAM and eMMC - only for the cheapest models.

"Virtual RAM" does not solve the problem. It doesn't replace real RAM and doesn't make the processor faster. On slow eMMC, such a feature hardly helps.

The best option for the T606 is a smartphone with 4-6 GB of RAM, UFS storage, and a lightweight UI. The worst is 2-3 GB of RAM, eMMC, and an overloaded system.

Camera, Video, and Connectivity

In terms of camera and video, the T606 remains a basic chip. It's not a platform for camera phones.

Typical offerings:

  • Video up to 1080p;
  • No 4K support;
  • Simple photo processing;
  • Weak night photography in most models;
  • Regular 4G LTE without 5G.

For daytime budget photos, this is sufficient. A fast camera, good night photography, and advanced photo processing are not typical of the T606.

Benchmarks and Real Experiences

In tests, the Unisoc T606 falls to the lower end of the budget segment.

Approximate results:

Test Unisoc T606
Geekbench 6 Single-Core about 370-400
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core about 1300-1400
AnTuTu about 300-340K

This is the level of a smartphone for calls, browsing, video, and basic apps. The CPU still handles basic tasks, but the graphics and overall performance headroom are limited.

A T606 with 6 GB of RAM and fast storage remains an acceptable budget device. A T606 with 3 GB of RAM and eMMC will experience more frequent slowdowns when launching apps and switching tasks, even though the SoC is the same.

What to Compare With

The Unisoc T606 is noticeably better than older ultra-budget platforms like the Unisoc SC9863A and weaker solutions with only Cortex-A53 cores. In such comparisons, it opens apps faster and operates more stably in the Android interface.

However, it already falls short against stronger budget chips.

Helio G80/G85/G88 are usually faster in games.
Snapdragon 680 is better in energy efficiency due to the 6nm process.
Newer 6nm budget chips are preferable if the prices are close.

The T606 should not be chosen as a powerful chip. It is justified if the smartphone is cheap and does not skimp on RAM, storage, and display.

Should You Get a Smartphone with Unisoc T606?

A smartphone with the Unisoc T606 makes sense for calls, messaging, browsing, YouTube, maps, and simple applications. The optimal configuration is 4-6 GB of RAM and fast storage.

For gaming, active multitasking, camera use, and longevity over 3-4 years, the T606 is too weak. Versions with 2-3 GB of RAM are best avoided if, for similar prices, there are Helio G85/G88, Snapdragon 680, or newer 6nm chips available.

Conclusion

The Unisoc T606 represents the baseline for a cheap 4G smartphone. It performs better than older platforms with Cortex-A53 but quickly hits limits due to the Mali-G57 MP1, the 12nm manufacturing process, and the phone's configuration.

It makes sense to consider it only in a budget model with 4-6 GB of RAM and ideally a UFS storage. The worst option would be 2-3 GB of RAM and eMMC, where delays will already be noticeable in basic tasks.

Basic

Label Name
Unisoc
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
Launch Date
September 2021
Manufacturing
TSMC
Model Name
T606
Architecture
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Technology
12 nm
Frequency
1600 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
GPU frequency
650 MHz
FLOPS
0.0832 TFLOPS
Shading units
64
Execution units
1
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.3
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
DirectX version
11

Connectivity

Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
5G support
No
Bluetooth
5.0
Wi-Fi
5
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR4X
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

L2 Cache
2 MB
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
Instruction set
ARMv8.1-A
Neural processor (NPU)
No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
372
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
1397
FP32 (float)
Score
81
AnTuTu 10
Score
261381

Phones with T606

Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
Infinix Hot 40i
Infinix Hot 40i
Meizu Note 21
Meizu Note 21
Motorola Moto E13
Motorola Moto E13
Motorola Moto G04
Motorola Moto G04
Oukitel WP28
Oukitel WP28
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
Tecno Spark 10C
Tecno Spark 10C
UleFone Note 16 Pro
UleFone Note 16 Pro
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
ZTE Nubia V70 Design

Tablets with T606

Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Blackview Tab 90
Blackview Tab 90
Doogee T10 Plus
Doogee T10 Plus
Teclast M50HD
Teclast M50HD

Comparison of Devices with T606

3DMark Sling Shot
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
1479
Infinix Hot 40i
1477
Oukitel WP28
1474
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
1473
UleFone Note 16 Pro
1470
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
1465
Motorola Moto G04
1462
Motorola Moto E13
1449
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
1440
Tecno Spark 10C
1438
Teclast M50HD
1425
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
1422
Doogee T10 Plus
1396
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
982
Infinix Hot 40i
982
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
981
Oukitel WP28
976
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
974
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
972
UleFone Note 16 Pro
972
Motorola Moto G04
971
Tecno Spark 10C
969
Motorola Moto E13
960
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
952
Teclast M50HD
951
Doogee T10 Plus
931
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
984
Motorola Moto E13
980
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto E13
1667
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Motorola Moto E13
1503
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
51
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
49
Meizu Note 21
49
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
49
Tecno Spark 10C
48
Motorola Moto G04
48
Infinix Hot 40i
48
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
48
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
48
UleFone Note 16 Pro
48
Blackview Tab 90
47
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
41
Motorola Moto E13
38
Oukitel WP28
38
Doogee T10 Plus
38
Teclast M50HD
37
3DMark Wild Life
UleFone Note 16 Pro
425
Tecno Spark 10C
420
Motorola Moto E13
420
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
419
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
23224
Motorola Moto G04
23017
Tecno Spark 10C
19305
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
18285
UleFone Note 16 Pro
17755
Infinix Hot 40i
16964
Teclast M50HD
16784
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
13187
Motorola Moto E13
10906
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
8505
Motorola Moto G04
8303
Meizu Note 21
8127
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
7995
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
7992
Infinix Hot 40i
7780
Oukitel WP28
7509
UleFone Note 16 Pro
7415
Reeder S19 Max Pro S
7292
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
7282
Blackview Tab 90
7263
Teclast M50HD
7207
Doogee T10 Plus
7168
Tecno Spark 10C
7034
Motorola Moto E13
6974
Infinix Hot 30i NFC
6948

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
1222 +228.5%
949 +155.1%
699 +87.9%
372
138 -62.9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
3499 +150.5%
2461 +76.2%
1837 +31.5%
1397
402 -71.2%
FP32 (float)
313 +286.4%
213 +163%
106 +30.9%
81
20 -75.3%
AnTuTu 10
521314 +99.4%
419580 +60.5%
316260 +21%
261381
59680 -77.2%