NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116: The Budget Warrior of 2025
April 2025
Introduction
Despite the rapid development of technology, the demand for affordable graphics cards for basic tasks and less demanding games remains high. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is an updated version of the legendary GTX 1650, still relevant due to optimizations and an accessible price (~$160–170). Let’s explore who this model is suitable for in 2025 and what compromises it offers.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Turing Architecture: Modest but Efficient
The GTX 1650 TU116 is built on the Turing architecture but lacks the "premium" features of the RTX series. The TU116 chip is manufactured using TSMC's 12nm process, providing a balance between cost and energy efficiency.
What it Can and Cannot Do
- RTX Technologies (absent): No hardware support for ray tracing (RT cores) and DLSS.
- NVIDIA Adaptive Shading: Optimizes GPU load through dynamic shader management.
- Partial DirectX 12 Ultimate Support: Works with features like Variable Rate Shading but not with ray tracing.
- FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR): Compatible with AMD's technology via drivers, enhancing FPS in FSR 3.0-supported games.
2. Memory: Speed vs. Size
GDDR6 and 4 GB: The Minimum for 2025
The card uses GDDR6 memory (previous TU116 versions were released with GDDR5) with a size of 4 GB and a 128-bit bus. Its bandwidth is 192 GB/s (12 Gbps * 128 bits / 8).
Impact on Gaming:
4 GB is sufficient for 1080p in titles like Fortnite or Apex Legends at medium settings, but modern AAA titles (e.g., Starfield or GTA VI) may experience stuttering due to insufficient VRAM.
3. Gaming Performance: 1080p as a Limit
Average FPS (medium settings):
- Counter-Strike 2: 120–140 FPS (1080p).
- Cyberpunk 2077 (without RT): 35–45 FPS (1080p, FSR 3.0 Quality).
- Hogwarts Legacy: 40–50 FPS (1080p, FSR Performance).
- The Finals: 55–60 FPS (1080p, low settings).
1440p and 4K:
For 1440p, you will need to lower settings to minimum or use FSR. 4K gaming is impractical: even with upscaling, FPS rarely exceeds 30 frames.
4. Professional Tasks: Not the Main Specialization
Video Editing:
In DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro, CUDA acceleration speeds up rendering, but 4 GB of memory limits work with 4K materials.
3D Modeling:
In Blender, rendering on CUDA is stable but slower compared to RTX cards. It’s sufficient for educational projects.
Scientific Calculations:
Support for OpenCL and CUDA allows the card to be used in low-budget research systems, but its power is only suitable for basic tasks.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP 85W: Powered by PCIe Slot
The card does not require additional 6/8-pin connectors, making it easier to build in compact cases.
Cooling:
- Reference Models: Passive or single-slot coolers are suitable for office PCs.
- Gaming Versions: Dual-fan systems (from ASUS, MSI) keep temperatures down to 65–70°C under load.
Case Recommendations: At least 1–2 intake fans to prevent overheating.
6. Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (4 GB GDDR6):
- Pros: Support for FSR 3.1, lower price (~$150).
- Cons: Weak performance without FSR, PCIe 4.0 x4 limits speed on older PCs.
Intel Arc A380 (6 GB GDDR6):
- Pros: More VRAM, supports XeSS.
- Cons: Drivers are still less stable than NVIDIA's.
Conclusion: The GTX 1650 TU116 excels over competitors in stability and energy efficiency but falls short in memory capacity.
7. Practical Tips
Power Supply: A 350–400W power supply is sufficient (e.g., EVGA 400 W1).
Compatibility:
- Works on PCIe 3.0 (no performance loss due to x16 interface).
- Supports Windows 11/Linux, but insufficient power for new APIs (DirectStorage).
Drivers:
- Regular updates from NVIDIA, but optimization for new games is gradually decreasing.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low power consumption.
- Silent models for office PCs.
- Stable drivers.
Cons:
- 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for modern games.
- No hardware Ray Tracing.
- Limited performance at 1440p.
9. Final Conclusion: Who is the GTX 1650 TU116 For?
This graphics card is suitable for:
1. Budget gamers playing less demanding or older titles.
2. Office PCs with occasional rendering tasks.
3. Upgrading old systems without replacing the power supply.
In 2025, the GTX 1650 TU116 remains a niche solution. If your goal is comfortable gaming on new releases at high settings, consider looking at the RTX 3050 or RX 6600. But for its price, this model still finds its enthusiasts.
Conclusion
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is an example of a "surviving" budget card in an era of teraflop GPUs costing $500. It reminds us that sometimes a modest and time-tested technology can be more advantageous than the pursuit of ultra-settings.