AMD Radeon R9 370

AMD Radeon R9 370 in 2025: Is it Worth Getting a Legend from the Past?
Professional Analysis for Budget Segment Enthusiasts
Introduction
Even a decade after its release (in 2015), the AMD Radeon R9 370 remains a topic of debate among gamers and PC builders. In 2025, this graphics card is more of an artifact than a relevant solution, yet it can still be found for sale (new units are rare, priced between $50–$80). Who is it suitable for? Let’s delve into the details.
Architecture and Key Features
GCN 1.0: The Foundation
The R9 370 is built on the Graphics Core Next (GCN 1.0) architecture with a 28 nm manufacturing process. This is the first generation of GCN, which laid the groundwork for future AMD solutions. The Trinidad Pro chip includes:
- 1024 stream processors;
- 32 texture units;
- 64 raster operation units.
Unique Features:
- Mantle API (the predecessor to Vulkan and DirectX 12) — improves optimization for multi-core CPUs;
- Eyefinity — support for up to 6 monitors;
- TrueAudio — hardware sound processing.
What’s Missing?
- FidelityFX (introduced in 2019) — the card does not support modern sharpness enhancement algorithms;
- Ray Tracing — not possible at the hardware level.
Memory: GDDR5 and Bandwidth
- Memory Type: GDDR5 (not GDDR6 or HBM);
- Capacity: 2 GB or 4 GB (versions differ in price and performance);
- Bus: 256-bit;
- Bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (for the 4 GB version).
Impact on Performance:
- 2 GB — critically low for 2025 games even on low settings (for example, Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty "consumes" 3–4 GB of VRAM at 1080p);
- 4 GB — the minimum acceptable option for lighter projects like Fortnite or CS:GO 2.
Gaming Performance: Realities of 2025
1080p Resolution (Low/Medium settings):
- CS:GO 2: 90–110 FPS (Medium);
- Apex Legends: 45–55 FPS (Low);
- The Witcher 3: 30–35 FPS (Low);
- Hogwarts Legacy: 20–25 FPS (Low, with drops due to VRAM shortage).
1440p and 4K: The card is not intended for these resolutions. Even in older games (like GTA V), 1440p delivers 25–30 FPS on Medium.
Ray Tracing: The lack of hardware support makes RTX effects unavailable. Software emulation (via Proton or mods) reduces FPS to 5–10 frames.
Professional Tasks: The Weak Link
- Video Editing: In DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro, rendering 1080p video will take 3–4 times longer than on a modern iGPU (e.g., Ryzen 8600G);
- 3D Modeling: Blender and Maya work, but only with simple scenes. OpenCL acceleration exists, but its effectiveness in 2025 is 15–20% compared to NVIDIA RTX 3050;
- Scientific Computing: The card supports OpenCL 1.2, but is unsuitable for machine learning or physical simulations.
Conclusion: The R9 370 is only suitable for basic tasks (office work, web design in Photoshop).
Power Consumption and Thermal Output
- TDP: 150 W;
- Recommended PSU: 450–500 W (considering headroom for the CPU and peripherals);
- Temperatures: 70–85°C under load (depends on the cooling system).
Cooling Tips:
- Use a case with at least 2 fans (1 intake, 1 exhaust);
- Replace thermal paste if the card is used (will reduce temperatures by 5–10°C);
- Avoid compact cases — hot air will stagnate.
Comparison with Competitors
Analogues from 2015-2017 (relevant in the second-hand market):
- NVIDIA GTX 950: Lower TDP (90 W), but worse performance in DX12 games;
- AMD RX 460: More energy-efficient, but weaker in OpenCL tasks;
- NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti: Better driver optimization in 2025, 4 GB GDDR5, 75 W TDP.
Modern Budget Analogues (2025):
- Intel Arc A380 ($120): Supports DX12 Ultimate, 6 GB GDDR6, 2-3 times higher FPS;
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 ($130): PCIe 4.0, 4 GB GDDR6, low power consumption.
Practical Tips
Power Supply:
- Minimum 450 W (80+ Bronze or higher);
- Ensure there is a 6-pin PCIe connector.
Compatibility:
- Platforms: Works with PCIe 3.0 and newer, but in PCIe 4.0/5.0 slots — no speed boost;
- Drivers: Official support from AMD ended in 2022. Use modified drivers (e.g., NimeZ) for Windows 11 24H2.
Nuances:
- Not compatible with Resizable BAR (technology from 2020+);
- On Linux, AMDPRO drivers work stably but without optimizations for new games.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Extremely low price for basic tasks;
- Repairability (simple design);
- Support for Multi-GPU (CrossFire) for experimenters.
Cons:
- Lack of VRAM for modern games;
- High power consumption relative to performance;
- No support for DLSS, FSR 3.0, or ray tracing.
Final Conclusion: Who is the R9 370 Suitable For?
This graphics card is an option for:
1. Builders of ultra-budget PCs (up to $200) for office work, studies, or retro gaming;
2. Enthusiasts experimenting with mods on old hardware;
3. Owners of old systems, where upgrading to a modern GPU requires replacing the PSU and motherboard.
Alternative: If your budget allows $120–150, it’s better to get a new Intel Arc A380 or AMD RX 6400 — they will reliably handle 2025 games on low settings and save on electricity.
Postscript
The R9 370 in 2025 is an example of a "surviving" GPU that continues to serve despite its age. It should only be considered as a temporary solution or a component of a nostalgic build. For all other scenarios, the market offers far more advantageous options.