Intel Core i7-3689Y

Intel Core i7-3689Y: Obsolete, but Still Relevant? Review of the Processor for Compact Devices
(April 2025)
Introduction: Why are We Reflecting on Ivy Bridge in 2025?
The Intel Core i7-3689Y processor, released in 2013, today looks like a relic from the ultrabook era of Windows 8. However, even after 12 years, it can still be found in niche devices and on the secondary market. What are its strengths, who might find it useful in 2025, and how does it compare to modern chips? Let's delve into the details.
Architecture and Process Technology: What’s Inside?
Cores, Threads, and Frequencies
The Core i7-3689Y is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture (3rd generation Intel Core) with a 22nm manufacturing process. It is a dual-core processor supporting Hyper-Threading (4 threads). The base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with a maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 2.6 GHz. In comparison, modern 10nm Intel chips (e.g., Core i5-1235U) have base frequencies starting from 1.3 GHz, but thanks to a more advanced architecture and 10 cores, they offer a significant performance boost.
Integrated Graphics
The built-in GPU is Intel HD Graphics 4000 with 16 execution units and a frequency of up to 850 MHz. In 2025, this is sufficient only for:
- Watching 1080p videos (with hardware decoding of H.264);
- Working with office applications;
- Light gaming such as Minecraft or Stardew Valley at low settings.
Support for DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0 limits compatibility with modern games and graphic editors.
Power Consumption and TDP: Compactness vs. Performance
The processor's TDP is 13W, which allows for use in devices without active cooling (e.g., tablets or thin ultrabooks). However, this low power consumption comes at a cost:
- Frequencies are reduced even compared to other Ivy Bridge chips (e.g., Core i7-3632QM had a TDP of 35W and a frequency of up to 3.2 GHz);
- The Turbo mode is rarely activated due to thermal limitations.
In 2025, processors with a similar TDP (10-15W) demonstrate 3-5 times higher performance due to a 5nm manufacturing process and multi-core architecture, such as Apple's M2, AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, and Intel Core Ultra 5 134U.
Performance: What Can the Chip Do in 2025?
Office Tasks
- Microsoft Office, browser: Working with documents and 5-10 tabs in Chrome is possible but with delays when rendering heavy pages.
- Zoom/Teams: Video calls at 720p without background filters - a limit.
Multimedia
- Video: Streaming 1080p (Netflix, YouTube) works without issues thanks to GPU decoding.
- Photo Editors: GIMP or older versions of Photoshop - yes, but with long processing times for filters.
Gaming
- CS:GO: 20-25 FPS at low settings in 720p;
- Fortnite: Not recommended, as frame rates will drop below 15 FPS.
Turbo Boost Mode
The maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz is achieved only under single-core load. In multi-threaded scenarios (e.g., rendering), the frequency remains at 2.0-2.2 GHz.
Use Cases: Who Could Use i7-3689Y in 2025?
1. Ultra-Budget Devices: Laptops priced under $300 (new but with outdated components).
2. Specialized Equipment: Terminals, POS systems, media panels where stability matters more than speed.
3. Secondary Market: Used ultrabooks (e.g., Dell XPS 12 2013) for $50-100.
Not suitable for:
- Modern gaming;
- Video editing;
- Working with neural networks or 3D modeling.
Battery Life: How Long Will the Battery Last?
With a battery capacity of 40-50 Wh (typical for ultrabooks from 2013-2015), the runtime reaches 6-8 hours while reading/viewing videos. This is aided by:
- Intel SpeedStep: Dynamic frequency reduction during idle.
- C-states: Disabling unused components.
However, modern processors (for example, Apple M2) provide 15-18 hours of battery life at a similar TDP.
Comparison with Competitors
AMD 2013: A6-4455M
- 2 cores, 2.6 GHz, Radeon HD 7500G.
- TDP 17W, but inferior multi-threaded performance due to lack of Hyper-Threading.
Modern Analogues (2025):
1. Apple M2 (5nm, 8 cores): 4 times higher performance with TDP 15W.
2. AMD Ryzen 5 7520U (6nm, 4 cores/8 threads): Supports DDR5 and RDNA 2 graphics.
3. Intel Core Ultra 5 134U (7nm, 10 cores): Artificial intelligence for workload optimization.
Pros and Cons
Strengths:
- Passive cooling;
- Compatibility with Windows 10/11 and Linux;
- Low cost of devices on the secondary market.
Weaknesses:
- Obsolete performance;
- Lack of support for AVX2, USB 3.2, Wi-Fi 6;
- Limited upgrade potential (DDR3L memory, SATA SSD).
Notebook Selection Recommendations
If you are considering a device with an i7-3689Y in 2025, pay attention to:
1. Type of Storage: Only models with SSDs (minimum 256GB). HDDs will make the system unresponsive.
2. RAM: 8 GB is the minimum for Windows 11.
3. Screen: Full HD (1920×1080) is preferable over outdated 1366×768.
4. Price: New laptops with this CPU are not manufactured, but on the secondary market, do not overpay more than $100-150.
Alternatives for New Purchases:
- Budget: Lenovo IdeaPad 1 with AMD Athlon Silver 7120U ($350);
- Ultrabook: ASUS ZenBook 13 with Intel Core Ultra 5 134U ($899).
Final Conclusion: Is It Worth Buying?
The Intel Core i7-3689Y in 2025 is an option for very niche tasks:
- As a temporary solution on a tight budget;
- To run legacy software that is incompatible with modern operating systems;
- In ecosystems where repairability is more important than speed.
Key Benefits:
- Affordability;
- Proven reliability;
- Compactness.
However, for most users, even budget modern processors (AMD Ryzen 3, Intel Core i3 12th generation) will be a better investment. Technology is not standing still, and 13W in 2025 is no longer a compromise, but rather a foundation for powerful and energy-efficient systems.