Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-7300HQ in 2025: Is This Outdated Processor Worth Considering?
April 2025
Even though the Intel Core i5-7300HQ was introduced back in 2017, some new laptops with this processor can still be found for sale at discounted prices (around $400–$600). However, in the era of 3nm chips and neural network accelerators, the relevance of this CPU raises questions. Let’s examine who might still find it useful in 2025 and assess its strengths and weaknesses.
Architecture and Process Technology: What's Inside?
Kaby Lake: Evolution Without Revolution
The Core i5-7300HQ is built on a 14nm process technology (codenamed Kaby Lake). This is Intel’s fourth generation, based on the Skylake architecture but with optimization for energy consumption and frequency.
- 4 Cores / 4 Threads: The absence of Hyper-Threading limits multitasking capabilities.
- Frequencies: Base clock is 2.5 GHz, maximum turbo clock is 3.5 GHz.
- Graphics: Integrated Intel HD 630 GPU with a frequency of up to 1000 MHz. It supports 4K video via HDMI 2.0, but is not suitable for gaming.
A distinguishing feature of Kaby Lake is enhanced video format decoding (HEVC 10-bit, VP9), which is beneficial for streaming video. However, by 2025, this is insufficient for tasks like AV1 or AI upscaling.
Power Consumption and TDP: Balancing Power and Heat
TDP 45W: The Laptop Won't Be Thin
This processor is designed for devices with active cooling—gaming laptops or workstations. In comparison, modern Intel Core i5 13th generation processors (like the i5-1340P) offer 12 threads and higher performance with a TDP of 28W.
- Heat Generation: Under load, temperatures can reach 90–95°C, requiring a quality cooling system.
- Energy Efficiency: Technologies like Speed Shift and SpeedStep dynamically adjust the frequency, reducing consumption during idle periods.
Performance: What Can It Do in 2025?
Geekbench 6: 1081 (Single-Core) / 2936 (Multi-Core)
The results are close to budget contemporary processors like the Intel Core i3-1215U (around 1100/3300), but multitasking performance suffers due to the lack of Hyper-Threading.
Real-World Scenarios:
- Office Tasks: Document work, browsing (10–15 tabs), Zoom— the processor handles it, but may stutter when running several heavy applications simultaneously.
- Multimedia: Editing 1080p video in DaVinci Resolve is feasible, but rendering will take 2–3 times longer compared to a Ryzen 5 5500U. Watching 4K at 60fps works without issues.
- Gaming: Only when paired with discrete graphics (e.g., GTX 1050 Ti or GTX 1650). In Fortnite (1080p, low settings)—40–50 FPS; CS2—60–70 FPS. The integrated GPU can only handle older titles like Dota 2 at low settings.
Turbo Boost: Temporary overclocking to 3.5 GHz helps with “spiky” loads (e.g., opening a heavy website), but during prolonged stress (gaming, rendering), frequencies drop to 2.8–3.0 GHz due to overheating.
Usage Scenarios: Who Would Benefit from the i5-7300HQ?
- Students: For studying, writing papers, basic presentation editing.
- Office Workers: Using Excel, 1C, email clients.
- Casual Gamers: Games released up to 2018–2020 (The Witcher 3, GTA V).
- Budget-Conscious Users: New laptops with this CPU are cheaper than equivalents with Ryzen 5 or Core i5 from the 10th generation and beyond.
Not Suitable For:
- 4K video editing, 3D modeling, neural network tasks.
- Streaming or simultaneous operation in virtual machines.
Battery Life: How Long Will the Battery Last?
With a battery capacity of 50 Wh:
- Idle (Web Surfing): 5–6 hours (CPU frequency drops to 1.2–1.5 GHz).
- Load (Gaming): 1.5–2 hours.
Energy-Saving Technologies:
- Intel SpeedShift: Switches the CPU between low-power states faster.
- C-States: Deactivates unused cores.
However, even these technologies can’t compensate for the high TDP—modern processors (like the Apple M2) perform 2–3 times longer in similar scenarios.
Comparison with Competitors
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (2018):
- Pros: 8 threads, Vega 8 graphics (30% more powerful than HD 630).
- Cons: Lower IPC (Instructions Per Cycle), worse optimization for Windows.
Intel Core i5-8300H (2018):
- 4 cores / 8 threads, turbo up to 4.0 GHz. Multithreaded performance is higher by 40%.
Apple M1 (2020):
- Single-threaded performance on par with i5-7300HQ, multithreaded performance is twice as high. Battery life—up to 15 hours.
Conclusion: In 2025, the i5-7300HQ lags behind even budget newcomers like the Intel Core i3-1315U or AMD Ryzen 3 7420U.
Pros and Cons
Strengths:
- Adequate performance for everyday tasks.
- Support for hardware decoding of 4K video.
- Low cost of devices based on this CPU.
Weaknesses:
- No Hyper-Threading.
- High heat generation.
- Outdated architecture: lacks support for PCIe 4.0, Thunderbolt 4, and DDR5.
Recommendations for Laptop Selection
If you still decide to buy a device with the i5-7300HQ in 2025:
1. Type of Laptop: Gaming (with discrete graphics) or business class (with a reliable build).
2. Cooling: Minimum of two fans and copper heat pipes.
3. Upgrade: Check for slots for SSD and RAM (16GB DDR4 and NVMe storage recommended).
4. Battery: At least 50 Wh.
Model Examples:
- Dell Inspiron 15 7567 (GTX 1050 Ti, 16GB RAM)—around $600.
- HP Pavilion 15 (GeForce GTX 1650, 512GB SSD)—$550–$700.
Final Conclusion
The Intel Core i5-7300HQ in 2025 is a choice for those needing a very cheap laptop for basic tasks. It can handle office work, movie watching, and undemanding gaming, but don’t expect miracles from it.
Who It’s Suitable For:
- Users with a budget of up to $600.
- Those not planning to run modern applications.
Alternatives:
- For $700–800, laptops with Ryzen 5 7530U or Core i5-1235U can offer better performance and battery life.
If your budget is flexible, it’s better to choose a more modern model. But if price is critical, the i5-7300HQ can still serve as a “workhorse.”