Intel Celeron N2940

Intel Celeron N2940

Intel Celeron N2940: A Budget Processor for Basic Tasks – Review and Recommendations for 2025

Introduction

Even in 2025, entry-level processors like the Intel Celeron N2940 remain in demand for ultra-budget devices. This chip, released back in 2014, continues to be used in some laptops priced at $200–300. But how relevant is it today? Let’s look into the details.


Architecture and Process: 22 nm and Four Cores Without Hyper-Threading

Key Specifications:

- Cores and Threads: 4 cores, 4 threads (no Hyper-Threading support).

- Clock Frequencies: Base – 1.83 GHz, turbo boost – up to 2.25 GHz (for short intervals).

- Architecture: Bay Trail-M based on Silvermont microarchitecture (optimized for low power consumption).

- Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) with a frequency of 313–854 MHz, 4 execution units (EU).

Architectural Features:

Silvermont was designed for mobile devices and tablets. Its strength lies in energy efficiency rather than performance. Four physical cores can handle simple multi-threaded tasks (e.g., background system updates), but the lack of Hyper-Threading and low clock speeds limit operational speed.

The integrated GPU can handle 1080p video decoding but is not suitable for gaming or rendering. For instance, in Minecraft at low settings, it delivers around 15–20 FPS.


Power Consumption and TDP: 7 W for Passive Cooling

TDP (Thermal Design Power): At 7 W, this is one of the lowest figures among x86 processors. This level allows:

- Use of passive cooling (no fans), which reduces noise and device weight.

- Providing long battery life – up to 10 hours in laptops with a 40–50 Wh battery.

Limitations:

Under active load (e.g., launching a browser with 10+ tabs), the processor quickly reaches its TDP limit, after which it reduces the frequency to the base (1.83 GHz). This leads to "stuttering" in scenarios with sharp load increases.


Performance: Modest Results Even for Office Use

Geekbench 6 Tests (2025):

- Single-Core: 168 (for comparison: Apple M1 – 2300, Intel Core i3-1215U – 1500).

- Multi-Core: 497 (Apple M1 – 8000+, Intel Core i3 – 4500).

Real-World Scenarios:

- Office Tasks: Google Docs and LibreOffice run without lag, but simultaneous opening of PDFs, a messenger, and 5–7 browser tabs may cause slowdowns.

- Multimedia: Watching YouTube at 1080p/60fps is stable, but it lacks power for 4K or streaming on Twitch.

- Gaming: Only lightweight projects like Stardew Valley or Terraria are feasible.

Turbo Boost: The boost up to 2.25 GHz works temporarily (10–15 seconds), which is useful for quick application launches but not for sustained tasks.


Use Cases: Who Should Consider the Celeron N2940 in 2025?

1. Students and Pupils: For working on texts, presentations, and educational platforms (Zoom, Google Classroom).

2. Elderly Users: Viewing photos, videos, and browsing the internet.

3. Backup Devices: Affordable laptops for travel or as a second PC.

Not Suitable for:

- Video/photo editing even in basic editors (e.g., Canva or Paint.NET).

- Modern operating systems with heavy interfaces (Windows 11 may run slowly; better to use Linux or ChromeOS).


Battery Life: Up to 10 Hours, But with Conditions

Impact of the Processor on Battery Life:

With moderate use (browser, office applications), laptops with N2940 and a 45 Wh battery work for 7–9 hours. However:

- Screen brightness should be around 50%.

- Background processes (updates, antivirus) can reduce time by 1–2 hours.

Power-Saving Technologies:

- Intel SpeedStep: Dynamically changes frequency based on load.

- C-States: Disables unused cores when idle.


Comparison with Competitors: Outdated but Cheap

1. AMD A4-9120C (2019):

- 2 cores/2 threads, TDP 6 W.

- Better graphics (Radeon R4) but worse multi-threaded performance.

- Device price: $250–300.

2. Apple A14 Bionic (in iPad 2021):

- 3–4 times faster in single-threaded tasks.

- However, macOS devices with a similar price ($300+) do not exist—only iPads.

3. Intel Pentium Silver N6000 (2021):

- 4 cores/4 threads, 10 nm, TDP 6 W.

- 30–40% faster in multi-thread than N2940, but laptops start at $350.

Conclusion: The N2940 falls short even against budget models from 2021–2023, but its strong point is its price.


Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Device cost: $200–300.

- Passive cooling (quiet operation).

- Sufficient for basic tasks on Linux/ChromeOS.

Weaknesses:

- Low performance for Windows 11.

- Does not support modern standards (USB 3.1, Wi-Fi 6).

- Limited update lifespan (drivers and BIOS).


Laptop Selection Recommendations

Types of Devices:

- Chromebooks: For example, ASUS Chromebook C423 (price: $220) – optimal due to the lightweight OS.

- Ultra-budget Windows Laptops: Proceed with caution! It's better to choose models with 8 GB RAM and an SSD (e.g., Lenovo IdeaPad 1 – $270).

What to Pay Attention To:

1. Operating System: ChromeOS or Linux is preferable to Windows.

2. Screen: An IPS panel with a minimum resolution of 1920×1080 – TN panels with poor viewing angles can still be found.

3. Memory: 8 GB of RAM is essential – 4 GB in 2025 is insufficient even for browsing.


Final Conclusion

The Intel Celeron N2940 in 2025 is a choice for those needing the most affordable laptop for basic tasks:

- Working with documents and emails.

- Watching YouTube and messaging.

- Using it as a "TV" or reading device.

Key Benefits:

- Price below $300.

- Quiet operation with no fans.

- Compatibility with lightweight operating systems.

However, for any serious work, including multitasking or modern applications, consider devices based on Intel N100 (2023) or AMD Ryzen 3 7320U – their prices start at $400, but they offer 3–5 times the performance.

Basic

Label Name
Intel
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
May 2014
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
Celeron N2940
Code Name
Bay Trail-M
Generation
Celeron (Bay Trail)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
4
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
1830 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
up to 2.25 GHz
L1 Cache
56 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
Intel BGA 1170
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
22 nm
TDP
7 W

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
HD Graphics

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
168
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
497
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
195
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
665
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
610
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
1050

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +112.5%
313 +86.3%
257 +53%
180 +7.1%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +39.4%
601 +20.9%
500 +0.6%
58 -88.3%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +71.8%
298 +52.8%
243 +24.6%
59 -69.7%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
840 +26.3%
770 +15.8%
557 -16.2%
436 -34.4%
Passmark CPU Single Core
832 +36.4%
731 +19.8%
475 -22.1%
289 -52.6%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1303 +24.1%
1193 +13.6%
806 -23.2%
587 -44.1%