Intel Celeron B720

Intel Celeron B720: An Outdated Processor for Basic Tasks in 2025
Reference Information:
- Architecture Codename: Sandy Bridge
- Process Technology: 32 nm
- Number of Cores/Threads: 1/1
- Base Clock Speed: 1.7 GHz
- Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics (based on Sandy Bridge, 650–1000 MHz)
- TDP: 35 W
1. Architecture and Process Technology: A Legacy from 2011
The Intel Celeron B720 was released in 2011 as part of the Sandy Bridge platform. It is a single-core CPU with support for one thread, making it a laggard even among today's budget solutions.
Architecture Features
- One Core, One Thread: No support for Hyper-Threading. Multitasking is limited—running a browser with 5+ tabs and an office suite will cause noticeable slowdowns.
- Integrated Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge): The base GPU frequency is 650 MHz, with dynamic boosting up to 1 GHz. It supports DirectX 10.1, but struggles with modern 4K video codecs (e.g., VP9 or AV1).
- Cache: 1.5 MB of L3 cache — critically low for data processing in 2025.
32 nm Process Technology: By 2025 standards, this is considered a "dinosaur." Modern Intel (Meteor Lake) and AMD (Zen 4) processors use 5–7 nm technology, ensuring better power consumption and performance.
2. TDP and Power Consumption: High Numbers for an Outdated Platform
TDP of 35 W — unjustifiably high for a single-core CPU. For comparison, modern Intel Core Ultra (Meteor Lake) processors with 12 cores have a TDP of 15–28 W.
Why Is This a Problem?
- Heating: In compact laptops, cooling a 35-watt CPU requires a massive heatsink, increasing the weight and thickness of the device.
- Noise: The fan will often turn on even under basic loads.
3. Performance: Limits of Capabilities
Tests in 2025 show that the Celeron B720 is only suitable for the most basic tasks:
Office Work
- Microsoft Word/Excel: Acceptable performance for documents up to 50 pages. However, opening complex spreadsheets with formulas (e.g., Excel with 10,000 rows) will take 15–20 seconds.
- Browser: Google Chrome can handle a maximum of 5–7 tabs. Streaming YouTube in 1080p will load the CPU to 90–100%, causing potential freezes.
Multimedia
- Video: Watching 1080p (H.264) videos is possible, but 4K or streaming services (Netflix, Disney+) with modern codecs are unsupported.
- Photo Editing: Editing in Photoshop Elements is limited to basic operations (cropping, filters). Working with RAW files is out of the question.
Gaming
- Old Games: Minecraft (versions before 2015) can run at low settings — 20–25 FPS.
- Indie Projects: Hollow Knight or Stardew Valley can achieve 30 FPS at 720p resolution.
Turbo Boost is absent — the frequency is fixed at 1.7 GHz.
4. Use Cases: Who Is It Suitable for in 2025?
- Elderly Users: For email, news reading, and video calls (provided a lightweight OS, such as Linux Lite, is used).
- Children's Laptops: Suitable for educational purposes and simple games.
- Terminals: In offices for access to 1C or web applications.
Do not consider it for:
- Graphic work, video editing, programming.
- Running modern operating systems (Windows 11 is not supported due to lack of TPM 2.0).
5. Battery Life: The Paradox of High TDP
Despite the 35 W TDP, battery life in laptops with the Celeron B720 rarely exceeds 3–4 hours (with a 40 Wh battery).
Power-Saving Technologies:
- Enhanced Intel SpeedStep: Reduces frequency during idle mode.
- C-States: Puts the core into "sleep" mode during inactivity.
However, due to the outdated process technology, even these features do not help with rapid discharging.
6. Comparison with Competitors
AMD E1-1200 (2012)
- Cores/Threads: 2/2.
- TDP: 18 W.
- Advantages: Better multitasking performance.
- Disadvantages: Weaker in single-threaded tasks.
Intel Celeron N4020 (2020, Gemini Lake)
- Cores/Threads: 2/2.
- TDP: 6 W.
- Advantages: 4K support, HDMI 2.0, up to 10 hours of battery life.
Conclusion: Even 10-year-old competitors like AMD and the new Celeron N-series outperform the B720 in every aspect.
7. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Price: Laptops with this CPU cost $200–300 (new models on sale).
- Repairability: CPU replacement is possible (PGA socket), but pointless.
Cons:
- Outdated architecture.
- No support for modern interfaces (USB 3.1, Wi-Fi 6).
- Limited performance.
8. Laptop Selection Recommendations
Avoid the Celeron B720 if:
- You need a laptop for study (Zoom + browser + documents).
- You plan to use the device for over 1–2 years.
Alternatives under $400:
- Lenovo IdeaPad 1 (AMD 3020e): 2 cores, 4 threads, TDP 6 W, battery life of 8 hours.
- ASUS Laptop (Celeron N4500): Supports Wi-Fi 5, 1080p screen.
9. Final Conclusion
The Intel Celeron B720 in 2025 is only a choice for those seeking an extremely cheap device for basic tasks. Its key "advantages" — price and availability of parts — are overshadowed by outdated architecture and high power consumption.
Who It Is Suitable For:
- Users looking for a "typewriter with a screen."
- Organizations deploying terminals for 1C.
What to Buy Instead:
- Laptops based on Intel Celeron N-series or AMD Athlon Silver — they are $50–70 more expensive but ensure compatibility with modern applications.
If your budget is strictly limited to $200–250, consider used devices with 8th generation Intel processors (e.g., Core i3-8130U) — they will offer 3–4 times greater performance.