CPU Comparison Result
Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core 5 120U: Is It Worth Paying Extra for Core 7?
The Intel Core 7 150U and Core 5 120U belong to the same class of mobile processors and differ less than one might expect from their naming. Both chips feature 10 cores, 12 threads, 12 MB of cache, and a base power limit of 15 watts.
The Core 7 150U operates at higher frequencies and is equipped with enhanced integrated graphics. However, the CPU parts of the models are almost identical, so in everyday tasks, the difference is usually minimal. The choice between them should be based on price and the overall configuration of the laptop, rather than solely on the Core 5 or Core 7 designation.
Key Differences
| Specification | Intel Core 7 150U | Intel Core 5 120U |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum frequency of P-cores | 5.4 GHz | 5.0 GHz |
| Maximum frequency of E-cores | 4.0 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics, 96 EU | Intel Graphics, 80 EU |
| Maximum GPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
In other respects, the specifications match: 2 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, 12 threads, 12 MB Intel Smart Cache, with a base power of 15 W and maximum turbo power of up to 55 W.
CPU Performance
The increased frequency of the Core 7 150U gives it a slight advantage in short loads: application launches, web page processing, working with spreadsheets, and isolated operations in graphic editors. However, the architecture and core configuration of the processors are the same, so the gap is not substantial.
In Geekbench 6, the single-threaded test results of the models are nearly identical, around 2080-2090 points. In multi-threaded mode, the Core 7 150U outperforms the Core 5 120U by about 3%.
In everyday use, such a difference is hardly noticeable. Browsers, office applications, video calls, and most educational programs run just as quickly on both processors. The Core 7 may finish tasks like archiving, photo exporting, or other short-lived jobs slightly faster, but there is no significant shift to the next performance class.
Under sustained load, the laptop's cooling system is more important. The Core 5 120U in a chassis with a higher sustained power limit can surpass the Core 7 150U in a thin model, where the processor quickly throttles frequency due to heat.
Both chips are suitable for everyday tasks and moderate multitasking. For regular rendering, lengthy video encoding, and compiling large projects, it’s better to choose processors from the H or HX series, which come with more performance cores.
Integrated Graphics
The main technical advantage of the Core 7 150U is the graphics block with 96 execution units compared to 80 in the Core 5 120U. With the same maximum frequency, this gives the higher model more computational resources.
The difference is most noticeable in less demanding games and applications that utilize GPU calculations. The Core 7 150U can deliver higher frame rates, but one shouldn't expect a consistent 20% increase: integrated graphics greatly depend on the bandwidth of the RAM and power consumption limits.
The dual-channel mode is particularly important. A laptop with a Core 5 120U and properly configured memory can be faster than a model with a Core 7 150U that has a single RAM module. Before purchasing, it’s wise to check not only the amount of memory but also the number of channels, expansion options, and the type of installed modules.
In hardware video decoding, the Core 7 doesn't have a serious advantage. Both processors support modern formats and are suitable for playback of high-resolution video. The additional execution units are primarily needed for 3D graphics rather than for viewing films.
For older games and less demanding online projects, both graphics are suitable at low settings. The main limitation remains the graphics: modern demanding games will require a discrete graphics card or a processor with a more powerful integrated GPU.
Power Consumption and Laptop Configuration
Both processors have the same rated power limits, so the Core 7 150U does not guarantee less heating or better battery life. Higher frequencies may slightly increase consumption in turbo mode, but in practice, battery life is more dependent on the screen, battery capacity, BIOS settings, and background programs.
The supported types of memory and interfaces in the models are also similar. Therefore, when comparing two laptops, it’s more useful to pay attention to the following parameters:
- 16 or 32 GB of RAM instead of 8 GB;
- dual-channel RAM configuration;
- quality and brightness of the screen;
- battery capacity;
- noise levels and cooling;
- possibility of SSD and memory upgrades.
These characteristics can influence the usability significantly more than a few percentage points difference between the processors.
What to Choose
It makes sense to choose the Intel Core 7 150U when laptops differ only in the processor, and the extra payment does not exceed about 5-7%. In this case, the user gains slightly higher CPU speed and more powerful integrated graphics.
With a larger price difference, the Core 5 120U is typically more advantageous. It provides nearly the same processing power, and the saved money is better spent on additional memory, a better screen, or a larger battery.
If a laptop is equipped with a discrete graphics card, the advantage of the Core 7 becomes even less significant, as its larger integrated GPU is seldom utilized.
As a result, while the Core 7 150U is technically the superior model, it is not always the better purchase. The Core 5 120U remains a more practical choice for office work, studying, and everyday use, especially when it is installed in a better-equipped or significantly cheaper laptop.
Advantages
- Higher Max Turbo Frequency: 5.4 GHz (5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Basic
CPU Specifications
Memory Specifications
GPU Specifications
AI Specifications
Benchmarks
Related CPU Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/cpu/compare/intel-core-7-150u-vs-intel-core-5-120u" target="_blank">Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core 5 120U</a>