Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

vs

SoC-Vergleichsergebnis

Nachfolgend finden Sie die Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs von Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 und Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 mobile Prozessoren basierend auf wichtigen Leistungsmerkmalen sowie Stromverbrauch und vielem mehr.

Vorteile

  • Höher Prozess: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Höher Frequenz: 3200 MHz (2840 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
  • Neuer Erscheinungsdatum: November 2022 (December 2020 vs November 2022)

Basic

Qualcomm
Markenname
Qualcomm
December 2020
Erscheinungsdatum
November 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Plattform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Herstellung
TSMC
SM8350
Modellname
SM8550-AB
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architektur
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Kerne
8
5 nm
Prozess
4 nm
2840 MHz
Frequenz
3200 MHz

GPU-Spezifikationen

Adreno 660
GPU-Name
Adreno 740
840 MHz
GPU-Frequenz
680 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.4816 TFLOPS
512
Shader-Einheiten
1280
2
Ausführungseinheiten
2
2.0
OpenCL Version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan-Version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Maximale Anzeigeauflösung
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX-Version
12.1

Konnektivität

LTE Cat. 22
4G-Unterstützung
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G Unterstützung
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Speicherspezifikationen

LPDDR5
Speichertypen
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Speicherfrequenz
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit

Verschiedenes

Hexagon 780
Neuronaler Prozessor (NPU)
Hexagon
1 MB
L2-Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio Codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Maximale Kamerareolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Speichertyp
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Videoaufnahme
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video Codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video-Wiedergabe
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
10 W
TDP
6.3 W
ARMv8.4-A
Befehlssatz
ARMv9-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Einzelkern
Snapdragon 888
1481
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993 +35%
Geekbench 6 Mehrkern
Snapdragon 888
3794
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328 +40%
Geekbench 5 Einzelkern
Snapdragon 888
717 +36%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
528
Geekbench 5 Mehrkern
Snapdragon 888
2413 +37%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1761
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3411 +94%
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 888
503622
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1143842 +127%

Vergleich von Geräten

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9612
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
11106
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
293
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1523
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3713