Intel Atom D2500

Intel Atom D2500

Intel Atom D2500: A Modest Workhorse for Basic Tasks in 2025

Introduction

The Intel Atom D2500 processor, released back in 2011, continues to be in use in budget devices even in 2025. Despite its outdated architecture, it finds applications in niche scenarios. Let's explore who might benefit from this chip in the era of neural networks and quantum computing.


1. Architecture and Process Technology: Modest Ambitions

Cedarview: An Era of 32 nm

The Atom D2500 is based on the Saltwell microarchitecture (part of the Cedarview platform) with a 32 nm fabrication process. It is a dual-core processor with Hyper-Threading support (4 threads) operating at a base frequency of 1.86 GHz without turbo boost.

Integrated Graphics

The graphics accelerator is the Intel GMA 3600 (PowerVR SGX545), integrated into the NM10 chipset. It supports basic tasks such as screen output and 1080p video decoding via hardware codecs, but it is not designed for 3D rendering. Modern operating systems, like Windows 11 LTSC or Linux distributions, can run on it, albeit without interface hardware acceleration.

Cache and Memory

- L2 Cache: 1 MB;

- Memory support: DDR3-800/1066 (up to 4 GB).


2. Power Consumption and TDP: A Cool Head

The processor's TDP is 10 W, allowing for passive cooling. This is a key advantage of the Atom D2500:

- Low heat output — ideal for compact devices;

- Minimal noise — no fans needed;

- Energy savings — crucial for portable devices.

In 2025, such a TDP may seem archaic compared to Intel’s N-series processors (7 W) or ARM chips (3-5 W), but the D2500 remains energy-efficient for its category.


3. Performance: Realistic Expectations

Geekbench 6:

- Single-Core: 80;

- Multi-Core: 118.

For comparison, the modern budget Intel N100 (2023) scores around ~1200/3500 points.

Real-World Tasks:

- Office Work: LibreOffice, Google Docs, PDF viewing — acceptable, but with delays when multiple tabs are open.

- Multimedia: YouTube 1080p (with hardware acceleration), Spotify, photo viewing — no problems.

- Gaming: Only 2D games (Stardew Valley, Terraria) or older titles like Half-Life 2 on minimum settings (15-20 FPS).

Turbo Mode: Absent. The frequency is fixed, limiting peak performance.


4. Use Cases: Who Will Appreciate the D2500 in 2025?

- Netbooks for Education: Devices like the Chuwi Minibook X with a 10-inch screen priced at $200–250. Suitable for schoolchildren or students for text and browsing work.

- Terminals: POS systems, info kiosks, digital signage — due to low TDP and reliability.

- Backup Devices: A "just-in-case" laptop for travel (e.g., Jumper EZbook X3 for $220).

- Linux Enthusiasts: Lightweight distributions (Lubuntu, Puppy Linux) transform the D2500 into a quiet home server for file storage or VPN.

Not Suitable For:

- Gamers;

- Freelancers working with graphics;

- Windows 11 users with modern applications.


5. Battery Life: How Long Will the Battery Last?

With a battery capacity of 30–40 Wh (typical for netbooks), the working time reaches 6–8 hours in reading/video playback mode. However, in 2025, this is an average figure — competitors like the Snapdragon 7c Gen 3 offer over 12 hours.

Power-Saving Technologies:

- Enhanced Intel SpeedStep — dynamic frequency adjustment;

- C-states — disabling unused cores.

Tip: Disable Wi-Fi and lower the screen brightness to squeeze out an extra 1–2 hours.


6. Comparison with Competitors: Who is Leading?

- AMD A4-9120 (2019): 2 cores/2 threads, 15 W TDP, Radeon R3. Performance is about 20% higher, but battery life is worse.

- Intel Celeron N4500 (2021): 6 W TDP, 2 cores/2 threads, UHD Graphics. 2-3 times faster in multitasking.

- Apple M1 (2020): An indirect competitor, but even a base MacBook Air with M1 in 2025 outperforms the D2500 by 15 times in performance.

Conclusion: The D2500 lags behind even budget models from the 2020s but shines in pricing.


7. Pros and Cons: Balancing Capabilities

Pros:

- Device cost: $200–300;

- Silent operation;

- Sufficient for basic tasks.

Cons:

- No support for modern instructions (AVX, AES-NI);

- Maximum 4 GB RAM;

- Weak GPU;

- Outdated interfaces (SATA II, USB 2.0).


8. Recommendations for Choosing a Laptop

Types of Devices:

- Ultra-Budget Netbooks: For example, the Lenovo IdeaPad 1 with an 11.6" screen ($230).

- Mini-PCs: Beelink U55 for a media center.

What to Look For:

- SSD Instead of HDD: Even a 128 GB SATA SSD will speed up the system.

- Screen: An IPS panel with a resolution of 1366x768 is the minimum for comfort.

- Ports: Look for at least one USB 3.0 for external storage.

Prices in 2025: New devices with D2500 are rare but can be found among "no-name" brands for $200–250.


9. Final Conclusion: Who Should Consider the Atom D2500?

This processor is for those who:

- Are looking for the cheapest new device;

- Don’t require high performance (web surfing, document printing);

- Value quiet operation and long lifespan.

Key Benefits:

- Price below $300;

- Ease of maintenance;

- Compatibility with lightweight OS.

Alternative: If the budget allows for $350–400, consider laptops with Intel N100 or AMD Athlon Silver 7120U — they will last longer and not disappoint in performance.


The Atom D2500 in 2025 is a relic, but for narrow tasks, it remains a viable option. As a backup device or terminal, it will still serve a purpose, but for most users, there are fresher solutions available.

Basic

Label Name
Intel
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
November 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
Atom D2500
Code Name
Cedarview
Generation
Atom (Cedarview)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
2
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
1867 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
N/A
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
Multiplier
15.0x
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
Intel BGA 437
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
32 nm
TDP
10 W
Transistors
176 million

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
80
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
118
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
100
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
173
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
322
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
233

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +346.3%
313 +291.3%
257 +221.3%
180 +125%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +487.3%
601 +409.3%
500 +323.7%
336 +184.7%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +235%
298 +198%
243 +143%
177 +77%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
688 +297.7%
588 +239.9%
471 +172.3%
332 +91.9%
Passmark CPU Single Core
822 +155.3%
703 +118.3%
588 +82.6%
458 +42.2%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1102 +373%
888 +281.1%
668 +186.7%
463 +98.7%