AMD FX-4320

AMD FX-4320: Budget Veteran for Specific Tasks in 2025
Architecture, Performance, and Use Cases of an Outdated Chip
Key Specifications: A Legacy from the Piledriver Era
The AMD FX-4320 processor, released in 2013, belongs to the FX series 4000 and is built on the Piledriver (Vishera) microarchitecture. It is a 32nm quad-core chip without multi-threading support (4 cores / 4 threads), with a base clock speed of 4.0 GHz and Turbo Core up to 4.2 GHz. The L3 cache size is 8 MB, and the TDP is 95 W.
Key Features:
- High base clock speed for its time — 4.0 GHz.
- Unlocked multiplier — potential for overclocking (up to 4.5–4.8 GHz with good cooling).
- Modular architecture: two cores share a common floating-point computation unit, which reduces efficiency in single-threaded tasks.
Performance in 2025:
- Geekbench 6: 506 (Single-Core), 1249 (Multi-Core) — on par with Intel Core i3-4130 or AMD Athlon 3000G.
- In synthetic tests like Cinebench R23: ~1200 points (for comparison, the Ryzen 3 3200G scores around ~2700).
Compatible Motherboards: Hunting for Rarities
The FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, which is not compatible with modern AM4/AM5. Suitable chipsets:
- 970: basic option (e.g., ASUS M5A97 R2.0).
- 990X/990FX: for enthusiasts (Gigabyte GA-990FX-Gaming).
Choosing Features in 2025:
- New boards are unavailable — only used or leftover stock (price $40–70).
- Check for USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gbps support (relevant for SSDs).
- For overclocking, motherboards with enhanced VRM are needed (e.g., ASUS Crosshair V Formula).
Memory: Only DDR3
The processor supports DDR3 with an official frequency up to 1866 MHz (depending on the motherboard).
Recommendations:
- Use dual-channel kits (2×8 GB 1866 MHz) — this will improve the performance of the built-in memory controller.
- Avoid cheap modules without heatsinks — overheating is possible during overclocking.
Power Supply: Don't Skimp on Reliability
With a TDP of 95 W and no integrated graphics:
- Minimum PSU wattage: 450 W (e.g., EVGA 450 BR).
- With a discrete graphics card (e.g., GTX 1650): 500–550 W (Corsair CX550).
Advice: Do not use power supplies without an 80 Plus Bronze certification — stability is important for overclocking.
Pros and Cons of FX-4320 in 2025
Pros:
- Ultra-low price: $30–50 on the second-hand market.
- Overclocking potential — can achieve up to a 30% performance boost.
- Compatibility with cheaper components (DDR3, used graphics cards).
Cons:
- Outdated architecture — inferior even to budget Ryzen 3 processors.
- High power consumption — 95 W compared to 35–65 W of modern equivalents.
- Lack of PCIe 3.0/4.0 — a limitation for modern GPUs and NVMe.
Use Cases: Where is FX-4320 Still Relevant?
1. Office PCs: Handling documents, browsing, and light applications.
2. Retro Gaming: Running games from the 2010s (Skyrim, GTA V on low settings).
3. Media Center: Streaming video (1080p), but unable to handle 4K.
4. Home Server Tasks: NAS or Linux-based router.
Practical Example: FX-4320 + GTX 1050 Ti + 16 GB DDR3 — a build for $150–200 for Fortnite at 720p/60 FPS.
Comparison with Competitors
- Intel Core i5-3570K (Ivy Bridge): Better in single-threaded tasks (+15% in games), but more expensive ($50–70 used).
- AMD Phenom II X4 965: Cheaper ($20), but 25–30% weaker.
- Ryzen 3 1200 (AM4): 50% more powerful, but requires DDR4 and a new motherboard.
Practical Assembly Tips
1. Cooling: A cooler like the Deepcool Gammaxx 400 — for overclocking and quiet operation.
2. SSD is essential: Kingston A400 240 GB will reduce system boot time.
3. Graphics Card: GTX 1060 or RX 570 — the maximum for balance with the processor.
4. BIOS Update: Ensure that the motherboard supports the FX-4320.
Final Conclusion: Who is FX-4320 Suitable For?
This processor is a choice for:
- Budget-conscious enthusiasts wanting to build a PC for $200.
- Owners of old AM3+ systems needing an upgrade without replacing the motherboard.
- Experimenters with overclocking and retro hardware.
Alternative in 2025: Ryzen 3 4100 (AM4, $80) or Intel Core i3-12100F (LGA1700, $90) — 2–3 times faster but require new components.
The FX-4320 is an example of a "battle-hardened veteran," still useful in niche scenarios. However, for serious tasks, modern platforms—even at the entry level—are a better choice.