Unisoc T9100
vs
Unisoc Tiger T612
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc T9100
and
Unisoc Tiger T612
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2700 MHz (2700 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2025 (March 2025 vs May 2022)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
Unisoc
March 2025
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
T9100
Model Name
Tiger T612
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76, 4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
12 nm
2700 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
780 MHz
GPU frequency
614 MHz
0.1997 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0786 TFLOPS
32
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3440 x 1440
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
-
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
5.3
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 32 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 30FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
-
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
T9100
900
+111%
Tiger T612
426
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
T9100
2469
+62%
Tiger T612
1522
FP32 (float)
T9100
201
+164%
Tiger T612
76
AnTuTu 10
T9100
542568
+124%
Tiger T612
242301
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
4733
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
1795
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
3673
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
1216
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
233
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
66
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
25569
Realme Narzo N63
Unisoc Tiger T612
12395
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
14289
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
9836
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-t9100-vs-unisoc-tiger-t612" target="_blank">Unisoc T9100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612</a>