Samsung Exynos 2400e
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400e
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: September 2024 (September 2024 vs November 2023)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (3110 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
September 2024
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400e
Model Name
Dimensity 9300
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3110 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
-
Transistor count
22.7
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
-
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
-
FLOPS
5.9904 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 9640 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
9600 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
8 MB
L3 cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400e
2141
Dimensity 9300
2225
+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400e
6542
Dimensity 9300
7857
+20%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400e
1341448
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+51%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2400e
1977269
Dimensity 9300
2447714
+24%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
18201
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18288
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
7699
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
7801
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
826
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
663
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
8351
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8162
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1771
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
18275
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
45132
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
17115
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
14205
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400e-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9300" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300</a>