Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Apple A18
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 2400e and Apple A18 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Max Bandwidth: 68.2 Gbit/s (68.2 Gbit/s vs 60 GB/s)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Apple
September 2024
Launch Date
September 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400e
Model Name
A18
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 4.04 GHz – 4x 2.4 GHz –
10
Cores
6
4 nm
Technology
3 nm
3110 MHz
Frequency
3780 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Apple A18 GPU
-
GPU frequency
1398 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.7894 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
128
-
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.3
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
7500 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
68.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
60 GB/s
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Neural Engine
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
NVMe
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 24FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 24FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400e
2141
A18
3403
+59%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400e
6542
A18
7828
+20%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400e
1341448
A18
1490144
+11%
