Samsung Exynos 2100
vs
MediaTek Helio G99
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2100
and
MediaTek Helio G99
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2022 (December 2020 vs May 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2020
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9840
Model Name
MT6789
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
6 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP14
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
854 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
1.5304 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.2816 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
64
14
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
8 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2100
1474
+101%
Helio G99
733
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2100
3334
+67%
Helio G99
1994
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2100
1499
+445%
Helio G99
275
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2100
579331
+37%
Helio G99
423470
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
7754
Infinix Xpad
MediaTek Helio G99
3657
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
7859
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
2784
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
8624
Motorola Moto G72
MediaTek Helio G99
3787
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
398
Infinix Zero 30 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
147
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
5715
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
1366
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1800
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
378
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
6072
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
1222
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
27774
Cubot King Kong Power 3
MediaTek Helio G99
30934
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
13280
Lenovo Tab Plus
MediaTek Helio G99
11879
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1562
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
366
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2100-vs-mediatek-helio-g99" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G99</a>