Samsung Exynos 1580
vs
MediaTek Helio G96
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1580
and
MediaTek Helio G96
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2050 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (October 2024 vs June 2021)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
October 2024
Launch Date
June 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8855
Model Name
MT6781
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
12 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2050 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 540
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
-
GPU frequency
950 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.243 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1580
1333
+105%
Helio G96
651
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1580
3971
+113%
Helio G96
1860
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1580
824714
+108%
Helio G96
395804
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
8438
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
MediaTek Helio G96
2500
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
10389
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
MediaTek Helio G96
3573
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580
657
UleFone Armor 24
MediaTek Helio G96
133
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
4866
Blackview BV9300
MediaTek Helio G96
1230
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580
62144
Infinix Note 12 (Helio G96)
MediaTek Helio G96
22860
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
14056
UleFone Armor 22
MediaTek Helio G96
9867
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1580-vs-mediatek-helio-g96" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1580 vs MediaTek Helio G96</a>