Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 1480 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2750 MHz (2750 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Higher Max Bandwidth: 51.2 Gbit/s (51.2 Gbit/s vs 17 Gbit/s)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2024 (March 2024 vs October 2021)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
March 2024
Launch Date
October 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 1480
Model Name
SM6375
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
2750 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Adreno 619
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.4864 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
128
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
17 Gbit/s
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 686
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
-
TDP
4 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1480
1158
+26%
Snapdragon 695
916
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1480
3485
+62%
Snapdragon 695
2145
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1480
720068
+60%
Snapdragon 695
451403
