Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
Samsung Exynos 1280
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
and
Samsung Exynos 1280
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (6 nm vs 5 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2022 (May 2021 vs March 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
May 2021
Launch Date
March 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM7325
Model Name
S5E8825
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
5 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642L
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP4
490 MHz
GPU frequency
1000 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.487 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
48
2
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 1200 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2550 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
5 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G
981
+15%
Exynos 1280
852
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G
2787
+45%
Exynos 1280
1927
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G
597891
+22%
Exynos 1280
490914
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4671
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
3759
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
3567
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
3827
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4926
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
Samsung Galaxy F34
Samsung Exynos 1280
226
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280
2307
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
18316
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
14150
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-vs-samsung-exynos-1280" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 1280</a>