MediaTek Helio P65
vs
Samsung Exynos 9610

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Helio P65 and Samsung Exynos 9610 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Newer Launch Date: June 2019 (June 2019 vs March 2018)
  • Higher Technology: 10 nm (12 nm vs 10 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 2300 MHz (2000 MHz vs 2300 MHz)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
June 2019
Launch Date
March 2018
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6768
Model Name
S5E9610
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Technology
10 nm
2000 MHz
Frequency
2300 MHz
5.5
Transistor count
3

GPU Specifications

Mali-G52 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G72 MP3
820 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
0.0787 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0918 TFLOPS
24
Shading units
18
2
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2560 x 1600
12
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 600 Mbps
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 12
No
5G support
No
5.0
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

LPDDR4
Memory type
LPDDR4X
1800 MHz
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
8 W
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio P65
377 +1%
Exynos 9610
374
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio P65
1191 +13%
Exynos 9610
1051
FP32 (float)
Helio P65
80
Exynos 9610
89 +11%
AnTuTu 10
Helio P65
232221
Exynos 9610
249902 +8%