MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3400 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: May 2024 (May 2024 vs January 2024)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2024
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 9300 Plus
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3400 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
22.7
Transistor count
-

GPU Specifications

Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
5.9904 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
192
Shading units
-
12
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-

Connectivity

Up to 7900 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 790
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9300 Plus
2256 +8%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9300 Plus
7396 +12%
Exynos 2400
6582
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9300 Plus
2259162 +33%
Exynos 2400
1698761

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme Neo7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
18852
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
16533
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
8050
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
663
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
581
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
8271
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
1898
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme Neo7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
1875
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
16874
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
5298
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
13665
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
UleFone Armor 28 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
58023
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
UleFone Armor 28 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
19083
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419