MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (May 2023 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2023
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6985
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
17
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
995 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
4.2028 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
192
Shading units
-
11
Execution units
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
Up to 7900 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
8533 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
8 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 690
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9200 Plus
2093
+1%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9200 Plus
5576
Exynos 2400
6582
+18%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9200 Plus
1579845
Exynos 2400
1698761
+8%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
14017
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
13472
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo S19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
6089
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
512
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Vivo X90s
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
6312
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo S19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
1474
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
1406
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X90s
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
13362
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X90s
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
3707
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
14033
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9200-plus-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>