MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2023 (May 2023 vs December 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
May 2023
Launch Date
December 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6985
Model Name
MT6896Z
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
17
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP6
995 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
4.2028 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.442 TFLOPS
192
Shading units
-
11
Execution units
6
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 7900 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
8533 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
8 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
MediaTek APU 690
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 580
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9200 Plus
2093
+70%
Dimensity 8200
1229
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9200 Plus
5576
+43%
Dimensity 8200
3892
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 9200 Plus
4286
+203%
Dimensity 8200
1413
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9200 Plus
1579845
+73%
Dimensity 8200
915634
AntuTu 11
Dimensity 9200 Plus
1822096
+47%
Dimensity 8200
1240821
AiTuTu 3
Dimensity 9200 Plus
158942
+35%
Dimensity 8200
117961
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
14017
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
13472
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo S19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
1474
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X90s
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
13362
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X90s
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
3707
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
14033
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
3801
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9200-plus-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8200" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200</a>