MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (3100 MHz vs 3050 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (December 2022 vs November 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2022
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6896Z
Model Name
MT6985
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
3050 MHz
-
Transistor count
17
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1000 MHz
1.442 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.5904 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
192
6
Execution units
11
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7900 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
-
L3 cache
8 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 580
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 690
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8200
1229
Dimensity 9200
1949
+59%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8200
3892
Dimensity 9200
5301
+36%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8200
1413
Dimensity 9200
3662
+159%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8200
915634
Dimensity 9200
1240205
+35%
AiTuTu 3
Dimensity 8200
117961
Dimensity 9200
154291
+31%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
13645
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
15351
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1357
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
12376
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3597
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
12714
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3570
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8200-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9200" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200</a>