MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (3100 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (December 2022 vs March 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2022
Launch Date
March 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6896Z
Model Name
MT6895Z/TCZA
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP6
950 MHz
GPU frequency
860 MHz
1.442 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.309 TFLOPS
6
Execution units
6
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
MediaTek APU 580
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8200
1229
+8%
Dimensity 8100
1141
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8200
3892
+7%
Dimensity 8100
3640
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8200
1413
+6%
Dimensity 8100
1335
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8200
915634
+8%
Dimensity 8100
843925
AiTuTu 3
Dimensity 8200
117961
+5%
Dimensity 8100
112163
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8372
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
9973
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
615
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5934
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1612
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5900
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
Realme GT Neo3 150W
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
32365
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Realme GT Neo3 150W
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
15366
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1563
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8200-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8100" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100</a>