MediaTek Dimensity 8050
vs
Samsung Exynos 1280
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
and
Samsung Exynos 1280
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (3000 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2023 (May 2023 vs March 2022)
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (6 nm vs 5 nm)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2023
Launch Date
March 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA
Model Name
S5E8825
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
5 nm
3000 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G77 MP9
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP4
850 MHz
GPU frequency
1000 MHz
0.9792 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.487 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
48
9
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2550 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
MediaTek APU 570
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8050
1119
+31%
Exynos 1280
852
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8050
3242
+68%
Exynos 1280
1927
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8050
709171
+44%
Exynos 1280
490914
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7386
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4671
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Infinix GT 10 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
6544
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
3827
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Infinix GT 10 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7011
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4926
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
453
Samsung Galaxy F34
Samsung Exynos 1280
226
3DMark Wild Life
Tecno Camon 20 Premier
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
4537
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280
2307
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
40984
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
18316
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
14855
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
14150
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8050-vs-samsung-exynos-1280" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Samsung Exynos 1280</a>