HiSilicon Kirin 9000
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3130 MHz (3130 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2021 (October 2020 vs December 2021)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Qualcomm
October 2020
Launch Date
December 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Kirin 9000
Model Name
SM8450
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3130 MHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
15.3
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP24
GPU name
Adreno 730
759 MHz
GPU frequency
818 MHz
2.3316 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.5128 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
768
24
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 4600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
2750 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6 W
TDP
5.3 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
AI accelerator
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 9000
1266
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 9000
3529
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
+14%
FP32 (float)
Kirin 9000
2378
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2462
+4%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 9000
925940
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1096529
+18%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6410
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10505
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
621
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6072
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9565
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2060
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2548
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6774
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10361
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
39858
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
9262
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2057
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2539
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-9000-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-1" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1</a>