Google Tensor G6
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Google Tensor G6
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 4110 MHz (4110 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Newer Launch Date: August 2026 (August 2026 vs January 2026)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (3 nm vs 2 nm)
Basic
Google
Label Name
Samsung
August 2026
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Tensor G6
Model Name
S5E9965
1x Arm C1-Ultra @ 4.11 GHz, 4x Arm C1-Pro @ 3.38 GHz, 2x Arm C1-Pro @ 2.65 GHz
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
7
Cores
10
3 nm
Technology
2 nm
4110 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
PowerVR C-Series CXTP-48-1536
GPU name
Xclipse 960
1286 MHz
GPU frequency
-
-
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Connectivity
5G Dual SIM Dual Active, Dual Data, IoT-NTN, NR-NTN
Cellular specific functions
-
5G NR Sub-6 GHz (FR1), mmWave (FR2), 3GPP Release 17, 5G-Advanced
Cellular technologies
-
Sub-6 GHz up to 6CC-CA, mmWave up to 10CC-CA, peak downlink up to 12 Gbps
Downlink functions
-
Up to 12 Gbps
Download speed
-
MediaTek 5G UltraSave 4.0
Modem power saving technologies
-
3GPP Release 17 2T-2T uplink TX switching
Uplink functions
-
MediaTek Smart Antenna
Wi-Fi antenna
-
Yes
5G support
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
Miscellaneous
-
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
-
Storage type
UFS 4.1
-
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
-
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
-
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
ARMv9.3-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Gemini Nano, Proactive Assistance, Live Translate for Media, Magic Capture, Instant Night Sight, Pro Zoom
AI features
-
Google Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor G6
2677
Exynos 2600
3150
+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor G6
7321
Exynos 2600
11100
+52%
AntuTu 11
Tensor G6
1933536
Exynos 2600
3161126
+63%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Google Tensor G6
1158
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Google Tensor G6
13107
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 11
Google Tensor G6
3353
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Google Tensor G6
14169
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/google-tensor-g6-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>