Apple A19 Pro
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

vs
Apple A19 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

Apple A19 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5: Apple Faster on Single-Core, Qualcomm Wins in Graphics and Multi-Core

The Apple A19 Pro is still faster on a single core, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is not far behind and significantly outperforms in Multi-Core. In heavy graphics tests, the Snapdragon typically performs better as well. However, the difference depends on the specific smartphone, its cooling solution, and power limits.

Characteristic Apple A19 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
CPU 6 cores: 2 performance + 4 efficiency 8 Oryon cores: 2 Prime + 6 performance
Maximum Frequency About 4.26 GHz Up to 4.74 GHz
GPU Apple GPU, 6 cores in iPhone 17 Pro/Pro Max Qualcomm Adreno
NPU / AI 16-core Neural Engine + Neural Accelerators in GPU Hexagon NPU
Process Technology 3 nm 3 nm
Hardware Ray Tracing Yes Yes
Typical Devices iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max Galaxy S26 Ultra, OnePlus 15, Honor Magic8 Pro, iQOO 15

CPU Performance

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 has almost caught up to the A19 Pro in single-core performance. The gap that was previously one of Apple’s major advantages has shrunk to just a few percentage points.

In multi-threaded tests, the situation is the opposite. The Snapdragon has eight CPU cores compared to six in the A19 Pro, making it significantly faster in Multi-Core.

Geekbench 6 on Specific Smartphones

Smartphone Processor Single-Core Multi-Core
iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro 3,834 9,988
iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro 3,871 9,968
OnePlus 15 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 3,618 11,116
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy 3,785 11,563

When comparing the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Galaxy S26 Ultra, the A19 Pro is about 2% faster in Single-Core while the Snapdragon has around a 16% advantage in Multi-Core.

Graphics

The A19 Pro features a six-core GPU with hardware ray tracing and integrated Neural Accelerators. However, in heavy graphics tests, the Adreno in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is typically faster.

Smartphone SoC 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited FPS
iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro 5,855 35.03
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy 6,645 39.8

In this test, the Galaxy S26 Ultra outperforms the iPhone 17 Pro Max by about 13%.

In Wild Life Unlimited, the OnePlus 15 scored 173.83 FPS compared to 159.53 FPS for the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

Why One Snapdragon Might Be Faster Than Another

The processor's name does not guarantee the same performance. Manufacturers set their own power limits and thermal thresholds and employ different cooling systems.

Additionally, Samsung uses a special version of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy. Therefore, the performance metrics of the Galaxy S26 Ultra do not reflect the performance of all smartphones with this chip. Models from OnePlus, Samsung, Honor, and iQOO with the same SoC can vary significantly in performance.

There is also a difference between versions of the A19 Pro. The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max have a six-core GPU, while the iPhone Air uses a version with five graphics cores. Thus, the results of the iPhone Air cannot be directly compared to those of the six-core version of the A19 Pro.

Gaming

For heavy gaming, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is currently the preferred choice. Its Adreno GPU is faster in tested 3DMark loads, and models with robust cooling maintain performance better during prolonged gameplay.

The vapor chamber in the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max helps reduce performance drops under extended loads, but in peak graphics tests, the A19 Pro still trails behind the best implementations of Snapdragon.

Therefore, when choosing a gaming smartphone, it’s important to consider not only the SoC but also the cooling solution of the specific model.

AI

Comparing the Neural Engine and Hexagon solely based on claimed TOPS is misleading: Apple and Qualcomm use different architectures and measurement methods. The actual speed of local AI functions depends on the models used and software optimization.

Conclusion

In terms of pure performance, the advantage goes to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. It outperforms the A19 Pro in Multi-Core and heavy graphics, while Apple maintains a slight edge in Single-Core.

However, when purchasing a flagship smartphone, these differences are unlikely to be decisive. Both SoCs provide a very high level of performance, and the choice between iPhone and Android depends much more on the operating system, ecosystem, cameras, battery life, and the device itself. An iPhone user is unlikely to switch to Android for just a few percentage points in benchmarks-and vice versa.

Therefore, the results of the A19 Pro and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 reflect a technical balance of power between Apple and Qualcomm rather than directly answering which smartphone to buy.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 4600 MHz / 4740 MHz (4260 MHz vs 4600 MHz / 4740 MHz)

Basic

Apple
Label Name
Qualcomm
September 2025
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
A19 Pro
Model Name
SM8850-AC/SM8850-5-AC
2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.51 GHz
Architecture
2x 4.6 GHz, 6x 3.62 GHz
6
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
3 nm
4260 MHz
Frequency
4600 MHz / 4740 MHz

GPU Specifications

Apple A19 Pro GPU 6-core with Neural Accelerators
GPU name
Adreno 840
-
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.6864 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
512
-
OpenCL version
3.0 FP
-
Max display resolution
On-Device Display Support • 4K+ @ 120Hz • QHD+ @ 240Hz

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
X85 5G Modem-RF System
6.0
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
up to 5300MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Instruction Cache 128 KB, Data Cache 64.0 KB
L1 Cache
-
6.00 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
L3 cache
8 MB
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV
1x 48MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 4.1
4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K video capture @120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Video codecs
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9
4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K HDR video playback @60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
A19 Pro
3744
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3757 +0%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A19 Pro
9758
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
12644 +30%
AnTuTu 10
A19 Pro
2112459
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3269240 +55%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Solar Bay
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
10894
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
13959
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
1988
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1443
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
1981
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1317
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
11594
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
14509
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
2447
ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3157
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro
2331
Honor Magic8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3043