Apple A15 Bionic
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400e
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Apple A15 Bionic
and
Samsung Exynos 2400e
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3230 MHz (3230 MHz vs 3110 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2024 (September 2021 vs September 2024)
Basic
Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2021
Launch Date
September 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W07
Model Name
Exynos 2400e
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche, 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Architecture
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3230 MHz
Frequency
3110 MHz
15
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Apple A15 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1338 MHz
GPU frequency
-
1.7126 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
512
5
Execution units
-
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
2732 x 2048
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 7500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 9640 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
L3 cache
8 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.5-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
A15 Bionic
2333
+9%
Exynos 2400e
2141
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A15 Bionic
5741
Exynos 2400e
6542
+14%
AnTuTu 10
A15 Bionic
1315838
Exynos 2400e
1341448
+2%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
8667
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
18201
3DMark Solar Bay
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3786
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
7699
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
267
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
826
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3275
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
8351
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3859
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1771
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/apple-a15-bionic-vs-samsung-exynos-2400e" target="_blank">Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400e</a>