Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2200
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2022 (January 2022 vs December 2020)
- Higher Frequency: 2840 MHz (2800 MHz vs 2840 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2022
Launch Date
December 2020
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
S5E9925
Model Name
SM8350
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2840 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Adreno 660
810 MHz
GPU frequency
840 MHz
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.72 TFLOPS
640
Shading units
512
3
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 22
Yes
5G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 780
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS
7 W
TDP
10 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
+8%
Snapdragon 888
1481
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
Snapdragon 888
3794
+3%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2200
3172
+81%
Snapdragon 888
1754
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9612
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
11106
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
293
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1523
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-888" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888</a>