Samsung Exynos 2100
vs
Google Tensor G2
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2100
and
Google Tensor G2
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2022 (December 2020 vs October 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Google
December 2020
Launch Date
October 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9840
Model Name
Tensor G2
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
5 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP14
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
854 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
1.5304 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
96
14
Execution units
7
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
8 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2100
1474
+24%
Tensor G2
1188
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2100
3334
Tensor G2
3468
+4%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2100
1499
+34%
Tensor G2
1119
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2100
579331
Tensor G2
824434
+42%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
7754
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2
8262
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
7859
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
8943
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
8624
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
10611
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
398
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
5715
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1800
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
6072
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
6726
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
27774
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
32023
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
13280
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2
11827
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1562
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1768
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2100-vs-google-tensor-g2" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Google Tensor G2</a>