Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
Samsung Exynos 9610
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
Samsung Exynos 9610
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 10 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2300 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs March 2018)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
March 2026
Launch Date
March 2018
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E8865
Model Name
S5E9610
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
10 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2300 MHz
-
Transistor count
3
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G72 MP3
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.0918 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
18
-
Execution units
3
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2560 x 1600
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 600 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 12
Yes
5G support
No
6.1
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
8 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
+264%
Exynos 9610
374
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+315%
Exynos 9610
1051
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
+1252%
Exynos 9610
89
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+464%
Exynos 9610
249902
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-samsung-exynos-9610" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Samsung Exynos 9610</a>