Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs January 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
March 2026
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E8865
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
-
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
Exynos 2200
1594
+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+18%
Exynos 2200
3685
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
Exynos 2200
3172
+164%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+56%
Exynos 2200
902026
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>