Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1380
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (2400 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (February 2023 vs November 2023)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
February 2023
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8835
Model Name
Dimensity 9300
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
-
Transistor count
22.7
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP5
GPU name
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
0.608 TFLOPS
FLOPS
5.9904 TFLOPS
5
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 3790 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5T
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
9600 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1380
1008
Dimensity 9300
2225
+121%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1380
2773
Dimensity 9300
7857
+183%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1380
620
Dimensity 9300
6110
+885%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1380
578941
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+251%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
5001
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
19049
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
6329
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18288
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Exynos 1380
280
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1905
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
2966
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
16337
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
808
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
4724
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
2844
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18317
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
45132
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
14205
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1380-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9300" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300</a>