MediaTek Helio G200
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 6300

vs
MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

MediaTek Helio G200 vs Dimensity 6300: Overclocked Graphics or Faster CPU and 5G

MediaTek Helio G200 was released later than Dimensity 6300 but has not become unequivocally the more powerful chip. Both platforms are manufactured using a 6nm process and utilize two Cortex-A76 cores, six Cortex-A55 cores, and Mali-G57 MC2 graphics.

The Helio G200 features an increased GPU frequency and supports cameras with resolutions up to 200 MP. The Dimensity 6300 offers higher clock speeds for its CPU cores and an integrated 5G modem. However, the performance of actual smartphones depends on the specific implementation: a device with Helio G200 may score higher on AnTuTu, but in certain CPU and GPU tests, Dimensity 6300 often holds the advantage.

Key Differences

Characteristic MediaTek Helio G200 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Performance cores 2 × Cortex-A76, up to 2.2 GHz 2 × Cortex-A76, up to 2.4 GHz
Efficiency cores 6 × Cortex-A55, up to 2.0 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55, up to 2.0 GHz
Graphics Mali-G57 MC2, up to 1.1 GHz Mali-G57 MC2
Mobile networks 4G LTE 5G Release 16
Maximum camera resolution 200 MP 108 MP
Main advantage Increased GPU frequency Faster CPU and 5G

In other respects, the platforms are quite similar. They support LPDDR4X memory, UFS 2.2 storage, and Full HD+ displays with refresh rates up to 120 Hz. Therefore, the overall speed of a smartphone depends not only on the SoC but also on memory, storage, cooling, and manufacturer settings.

CPU Performance

The Dimensity 6300 has a higher clock speed for its two performance Cortex-A76 cores: 2.4 GHz versus 2.2 GHz for Helio G200. The configuration of six efficiency cores is the same.

In Geekbench 6, the Dimensity 6300 scores around 790 points in single-threaded tests, while Helio G200 scores approximately 755. The difference is about 5%. In multi-threaded mode, the results are nearly identical, falling in the range of 2030-2040 points.

The slight advantage for Dimensity 6300 may manifest during app launches, handling complex web pages, and other short bursts of load on one or two performance cores. However, during prolonged multi-threaded work, there is no noticeable gap between the processors.

AnTuTu and Smartphone Results

AnTuTu is particularly popular for comparing smartphones, but its overall score characterizes the entire device. The test takes into account CPU, GPU, memory, storage, and interface speed, so the result cannot be considered a pure comparison of processors.

Test Smartphone with Helio G200 Result Smartphone with Dimensity 6300 Result
AnTuTu 10 Infinix Hot 60 Pro 465,122 Samsung Galaxy M16 5G 423,000
3DMark Sling Shot Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ 3,564 Ulefone Armor X32 Pro 3,873
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ 2,760 Ulefone Armor X31 Pro 2,834
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ 147 Ulefone Armor Mini 20T Pro 153
PCMark Work 3.0 Infinix Hot 60 Pro 10,896 Motorola Moto G Power (2025) 11,299
PCMark Storage 2.0 Infinix Hot 60 Pro 28,347 Realme 14x 5G 36,102

In AnTuTu 10, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 5G by about 10%. This is an important result for buyers of ready-made smartphones, but it does not mean that the CPU Helio G200 is faster. The overall score also depends on the increased GPU frequency, memory size, storage speed, and device firmware.

In some graphic tests, the picture changes. Smartphones with Dimensity 6300 outpace the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ by about 3-9%. Thus, the increased frequency of the Mali-G57 MC2 in Helio G200 does not provide a stable gaming advantage across all devices.

In PCMark Work, the gap is less than 4%, making it difficult to notice the difference between the processors in daily applications.

PCMark Storage depends more on the specific storage device than on the SoC. Both platforms support UFS 2.2, but the Realme 14x 5G turned out to be about 27% faster than the Infinix Hot 60 Pro. This clearly demonstrates how much the performance of the finished smartphone depends on the memory chip selection and software optimization made by the manufacturer.

The main limitation of both chips remains the Mali-G57 MC2 graphics. It can handle less demanding games and popular network projects, but in heavy games, you will need to reduce the graphics quality and frame rate.

4G vs 5G

The support for mobile networks is the most significant difference between the processors.

Helio G200 works only with 4G LTE. Dimensity 6300 supports 5G Release 16, aggregation of two carriers, and download speeds of up to 3.3 Gbps.

The advantage of Dimensity 6300 lies not only in its maximum speed. A smartphone with 5G will gain access to new bands and network capabilities as the infrastructure develops.

Helio G200 makes sense in two cases:

  • 5G is hardly used in the region;
  • a smartphone with Helio G200 is significantly cheaper than a comparable model with Dimensity 6300.

At equal prices, it makes no sense to give up 5G for the sake of an increased GPU frequency.

Cameras and Displays

Helio G200 supports cameras with resolutions up to 200 MP, while Dimensity 6300 supports up to 108 MP. However, the maximum sensor resolution says little about the quality of the photos. The result is more influenced by the sensor size, optics, stabilization, and processing algorithms.

For example, the TECNO Spark 40 Pro+ using Helio G200 has a 50 MP main camera. The smartphone stands out not for the camera resolution, but for its combination of a 144 Hz AMOLED display, a slim body, and wireless charging.

Both processors officially support Full HD+ displays with refresh rates up to 120 Hz. A higher refresh rate or resolution of the panel in a specific model characterizes the smartphone's equipment, not the performance of the processor itself.

Where the Processors are Found

Helio G200 is mainly used in thin 4G models from TECNO and Infinix, where the focus is on the display, design, and charging:

  • TECNO Spark 40 Pro+;
  • Infinix Hot 60 Pro;
  • Infinix Hot 60 Pro+.

Dimensity 6300 is found in a wider range of budget 5G smartphones - from mass models by Samsung and Realme to rugged devices from Ulefone:

  • Samsung Galaxy M16 5G;
  • TECNO Spark 30 5G;
  • Realme 14x 5G;
  • Motorola Moto G Power (2025);
  • Ulefone Armor X31 Pro;
  • Ulefone Armor X32 Pro;
  • Ulefone Armor Mini 20T Pro.

A broader choice of devices is another practical advantage of Dimensity 6300. It is easier to find a smartphone with the desired combination of display, battery, chassis, and price using this chip.

Which Processor is Better

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 wins the comparison based on overall capabilities. It is approximately 5% faster in single-threaded loads, matches in multi-threaded mode, and supports 5G.

Helio G200 can achieve a higher total AnTuTu score in a well-optimized smartphone. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro is such an example. However, individual GPU tests do not confirm a consistent gaming superiority, and the higher AnTuTu score partially depends on memory, storage, and device firmware.

At similar prices, it is better to choose a smartphone with Dimensity 6300. A model with Helio G200 is justified if it offers significant savings or more robust specifications. For instance, the TECNO Spark 40 Pro+ offers a 144 Hz AMOLED display, a thickness of 6.49 mm, 45W wired charging, and 30W wireless charging - in this case, the advantages of the smartphone itself may outweigh the lack of 5G.

Advantages

  • Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (May 2025 vs April 2024)
  • Higher Frequency: 2400 MHz (2200 MHz vs 2400 MHz)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
May 2025
Launch Date
April 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Helio G200
Model Name
Dimensity 6300
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2200 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz

GPU Specifications

Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
-
0.1408 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
32
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
-

Connectivity

Up to 650 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
-
No
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 2.2
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G200
755
Dimensity 6300
790 +5%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G200
2038 +0%
Dimensity 6300
2030
AnTuTu 10
Helio G200
435929
Dimensity 6300
476569 +9%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
3564
UleFone Armor X32 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
3873
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
2760
UleFone Armor X31 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
2834
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
147
UleFone Armor Mini 20T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
153
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
28347
Realme 14x
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
36102
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
10896
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
11299