MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3400 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2024 (November 2024 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
November 2024
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 9400
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
3400 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9400
2832
+36%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9400
11974
+82%
Exynos 2400
6582
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9400
3518353
+107%
Exynos 2400
1698761
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
11475
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
805
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
762
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
11764
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2452
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2442
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
18601
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
6418
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
164746
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oppo Find X8
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
16605
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9400-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>