MediaTek Dimensity 920
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 920
and
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (August 2021 vs October 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
HiSilicon
August 2021
Launch Date
October 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
SMIC
MT6877T
Model Name
Kirin 8000
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
7 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
10
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP4
950 MHz
GPU frequency
864 MHz
0.684 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.4423 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
128
4
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 2770 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
4 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 920
931
Kirin 8000
1019
+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 920
2331
Kirin 8000
3007
+29%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 920
698
+61%
Kirin 8000
433
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 920
521314
Kirin 8000
666377
+28%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z7
MediaTek Dimensity 920
5234
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
6308
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z7
MediaTek Dimensity 920
4185
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
5406
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo V23 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 920
240
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
316
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Infinix Zero 2023
MediaTek Dimensity 920
33622
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
46991
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme 9 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 920
13354
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
10251
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-920-vs-hisilicon-kirin-8000" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000</a>