MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2023 (September 2023 vs May 2023)
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
September 2023
Launch Date
May 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Model Name
MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP9
-
GPU frequency
850 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.9792 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
4
Execution units
9
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
MediaTek APU 650
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 570
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1125
+1%
Dimensity 8050
1119
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
2705
Dimensity 8050
3242
+20%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
775994
+9%
Dimensity 8050
709171
AntuTu 11
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1003078
Dimensity 8050
1029484
+3%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7006
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7386
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
6190
Infinix GT 10 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
6544
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7347
Infinix GT 10 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7011
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
467
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
453
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4228
Tecno Camon 20 Premier
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
4537
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1179
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
1300
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-7200-ultra-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8050" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050</a>