HiSilicon Kirin 9020
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400e
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
and
Samsung Exynos 2400e
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: December 2024 (December 2024 vs September 2024)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (7 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3110 MHz (2500 MHz vs 3110 MHz)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Samsung
December 2024
Launch Date
September 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
SMIC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Kirin 9020
Model Name
Exynos 2400e
1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan
4x 1.6 GHz – TaiShan
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan
4x 1.6 GHz – TaiShan
Architecture
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
7 nm
Technology
4 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
3110 MHz
GPU Specifications
Maleoon 920
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
840 MHz
GPU frequency
-
-
Shading units
512
4
Execution units
-
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 4600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 9640 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2750 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
5 MB
L2 Cache
-
10 MB
L3 cache
8 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Da Vinci
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 9020
1648
Exynos 2400e
2141
+30%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 9020
5420
Exynos 2400e
6542
+21%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 9020
1236035
Exynos 2400e
1341448
+9%
AntuTu 11
Kirin 9020
1383793
Exynos 2400e
1977269
+43%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Pura 80 Pro+ / Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
452
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1771
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
10517
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e
17115
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-9020-vs-samsung-exynos-2400e" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e</a>