HiSilicon Kirin 8000
vs
MediaTek Helio G200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
and
MediaTek Helio G200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2400 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (7 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (October 2024 vs May 2025)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
MediaTek
October 2024
Launch Date
May 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
SMIC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Kirin 8000
Model Name
Helio G200
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
864 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
0.4423 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1408 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
32
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 8000
1019
+35%
Helio G200
755
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 8000
3007
+48%
Helio G200
2038
FP32 (float)
Kirin 8000
433
+216%
Helio G200
137
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 8000
666377
+53%
Helio G200
435929
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
6308
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
3564
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
5406
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
2760
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
362
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
147
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
46991
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
28347
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
10251
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
10896
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-8000-vs-mediatek-helio-g200" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G200</a>