Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Unisoc Tiger T615
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2200
and
Unisoc Tiger T615
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: August 2024 (January 2022 vs August 2024)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Unisoc
January 2022
Launch Date
August 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9925
Model Name
Tiger T615
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
12 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
810 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1088 TFLOPS
640
Shading units
64
3
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
7 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
+269%
Tiger T615
432
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
+159%
Tiger T615
1425
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2200
3172
+2892%
Tiger T615
106
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2200
902026
+254%
Tiger T615
254636
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
Itel P65
Unisoc Tiger T615
1258
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
Blackview Mega 2
Unisoc Tiger T615
65
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
Blackview Mega 2
Unisoc Tiger T615
24992
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Blackview Mega 2
Unisoc Tiger T615
8688
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-unisoc-tiger-t615" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tiger T615</a>