Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (January 2022 vs November 2022)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2022
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9925
Model Name
SM8550-AB
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz

GPU Specifications

Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Adreno 740
810 MHz
GPU frequency
680 MHz
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.4816 TFLOPS
640
Shading units
1280
3
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
7 W
TDP
6.3 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993 +25%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328 +45%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2200
3172
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3411 +8%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2200
902026
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709 +72%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5622
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
549
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
6471
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3713