Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs September 2023)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2026
Launch Date
September 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8865
Model Name
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP4
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
-
128
Shading units
-
-
Execution units
4
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
-
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 650
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
+21%
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1125
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+61%
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
2705
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+82%
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
775994
AntuTu 11
Exynos 1680
1390055
+39%
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1003078
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
467
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4228
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1179
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-mediatek-dimensity-7200-ultra" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra</a>