Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
and
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 7 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2020 (December 2020 vs October 2019)
- Higher Frequency: 2860 MHz (2840 MHz vs 2860 MHz)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
HiSilicon
December 2020
Launch Date
October 2019
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
Kirin 990 5G
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
7 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
2860 MHz
-
Transistor count
8
GPU Specifications
Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-G76 MP16
840 MHz
GPU frequency
600 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
36
2
Execution units
16
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3360 x 1440
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 2500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4600 Mbps
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VC-1
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Da Vinci
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481
+53%
Kirin 990 5G
969
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
+19%
Kirin 990 5G
3176
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754
+149%
Kirin 990 5G
705
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8231
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
4145
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6230
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
5630
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
359
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
3293
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
1026
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
3325
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
23941
PCMark for Android Work 2.0
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9485
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
7672
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
8371
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-888-vs-hisilicon-kirin-990-5g" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G</a>