Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
Samsung Exynos 1380

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus and Samsung Exynos 1380 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
  • Higher Technology: 5 nm (6 nm vs 5 nm)
  • Newer Launch Date: February 2023 (October 2021 vs February 2023)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
October 2021
Launch Date
February 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM7325-AE
Model Name
S5E8835
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
5 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 642
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP5
550 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.608 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12.1
DirectX version
-

Connectivity

Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3790 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
5 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069 +6%
Exynos 1380
1008
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008 +8%
Exynos 1380
2773
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861 +39%
Exynos 1380
620
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344 +4%
Exynos 1380
578941

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
5860
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
4729
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4439
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
4335
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
5001
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
6329
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
244
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Exynos 1380
280
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
2966
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
808
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
2844
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227