MediaTek Helio P35
vs
Unisoc Tiger T616

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Helio P35 and Unisoc Tiger T616 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 2300 MHz (2300 MHz vs 2000 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: January 2021 (December 2018 vs January 2021)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
Unisoc
December 2018
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Low end
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6765
Model Name
Tiger T616
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Technology
12 nm
2300 MHz
Frequency
2000 MHz

GPU Specifications

PowerVR GE8320
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
680 MHz
GPU frequency
750 MHz
0.0435 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.096 TFLOPS
8
Shading units
64
4
Execution units
1
1.2
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2400 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12
DirectX version
11

Connectivity

Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
5.0
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
1600 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 25MP, 2x 13MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
1K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
1080p at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
2.2 W
TDP
-
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
No
Neural processor (NPU)
No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio P35
261
Tiger T616
453 +74%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio P35
814
Tiger T616
1509 +85%
FP32 (float)
Helio P35
44
Tiger T616
98 +123%
AnTuTu 10
Helio P35
141956
Tiger T616
279366 +97%