MediaTek Helio G96 vs Unisoc T820
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Helio G96 and Unisoc T820 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Max Bandwidth: 17.1 Gbit/s (17.1 Gbit/s vs 17.07 Gbit/s)
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (12 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2700 MHz (2050 MHz vs 2700 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (June 2021 vs November 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Unisoc
June 2021
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6781
Model Name
T820
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Technology
6 nm
2050 MHz
Frequency
2700 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP4
950 MHz
GPU frequency
780 MHz
0.243 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.4352 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3440 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 15
No
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
17.1 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
17.07 Gbit/s
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G96
651
T820
764
+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G96
1860
T820
2301
+24%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G96
395804
T820
482197
+22%
