MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 4600 MHz (3730 MHz vs 4600 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2025 (April 2025 vs September 2025)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Qualcomm
April 2025
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6991 MT6991Z/TCZA
Model Name
SM8850
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
2x 4.6 GHz, 6x 3.62 GHz
8
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
3 nm
3730 MHz
Frequency
4600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Adreno 840
1612 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
4.9521 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.6864 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
512
3.0
OpenCL version
3.0 FP
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
On-Device Display Support • 4K+ @ 120Hz • QHD+ @ 240Hz
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
X85 5G Modem-RF System
6.0
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
5333 MHz
Memory frequency
up to 5300MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
L3 cache
16 MB
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K video capture @120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K HDR video playback @60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
MediaTek NPU 890
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2956
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3757
+27%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9400 Plus
9090
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
12644
+39%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 9400 Plus
5002
+38%
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3612
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2678086
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
4177588
+56%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
11422
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
13959
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
834
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1443
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Extreme Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
789
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1317
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
11756
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
14509
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2427
ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3157
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2491
Honor Magic8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3043
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
18206
Realme GT8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
22090
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X200s
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
5777
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
6031
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
188713
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
189969
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
22888
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
27852
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9400-plus-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-elite-gen-5" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5</a>